Hi Hans, Thanks for the extensive review. On 15/05/2018 08:58, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 05/15/2018 12:40 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> The Chrome OS Embedded Controller can expose a CEC bus, this patch add the >> driver for such feature of the Embedded Controller. >> >> This driver is part of the cros-ec MFD and will be add as a sub-device when >> the feature bit is exposed by the EC. >> >> The controller will only handle a single logical address and handles >> all the messages retries and will only expose Success or Error. >> >> When the logical address is invalid, the controller will act as a CEC sniffer >> and transfer all messages on the bus. > > I did not see any support for this. If this works as you state here, then adding > support for CEC_CAP_MONITOR_ALL is highly recommended. Oops, I forgot to remove this phrase, the FW will maybe support it, but it has been dropped for the first revision. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/media/platform/Kconfig | 11 + >> drivers/media/platform/Makefile | 2 + >> drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c | 331 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 345 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/Makefile >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c > > Shouldn't the directory be called cros-ec-cec? > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/Kconfig b/drivers/media/platform/Kconfig >> index c7a1cf8..e55a8ed2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/Kconfig >> @@ -546,6 +546,17 @@ menuconfig CEC_PLATFORM_DRIVERS >> >> if CEC_PLATFORM_DRIVERS >> >> +config VIDEO_CROS_EC_CEC >> + tristate "Chrome OS EC CEC driver" >> + depends on MFD_CROS_EC || COMPILE_TEST >> + select CEC_CORE >> + select CEC_NOTIFIER >> + ---help--- >> + If you say yes here you will get support for the >> + Chrome OS Embedded Controller's CEC. >> + The CEC bus is present in the HDMI connector and enables communication >> + between compatible devices. >> + >> config VIDEO_MESON_AO_CEC >> tristate "Amlogic Meson AO CEC driver" >> depends on ARCH_MESON || COMPILE_TEST >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/Makefile b/drivers/media/platform/Makefile >> index 932515d..0e0582e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/Makefile >> @@ -92,3 +92,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS) += qcom/camss-8x16/ >> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_VENUS) += qcom/venus/ >> >> obj-y += meson/ >> + >> +obj-y += cros-ec/ >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/Makefile b/drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/Makefile >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..9ce97f9 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/Makefile >> @@ -0,0 +1 @@ >> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CROS_EC_CEC) += cros-ec-cec.o >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c b/drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..fea90da >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,331 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ >> +/* >> + * CEC driver for Chrome OS Embedded Controller >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2018 BayLibre, SAS >> + * Author: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> + */ >> + >> +#include <linux/kernel.h> >> +#include <linux/module.h> >> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> >> +#include <linux/dmi.h> >> +#include <linux/cec.h> >> +#include <linux/slab.h> >> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> >> +#include <media/cec.h> >> +#include <media/cec-notifier.h> >> +#include <linux/mfd/cros_ec.h> >> +#include <linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h> >> + >> +#define DRV_NAME "cros-ec-cec" >> + >> +/** >> + * struct cros_ec_cec - Driver data for EC CEC >> + * >> + * @cros_ec: Pointer to EC device >> + * @notifier: Notifier info for responding to EC events >> + * @adap: CEC adapter >> + * @notify: CEC notifier pointer >> + * @rc_msg: storage for a received message >> + */ >> +struct cros_ec_cec { >> + struct cros_ec_device *cros_ec; >> + struct notifier_block notifier; >> + struct cec_adapter *adap; >> + struct cec_notifier *notify; >> + struct cec_msg rx_msg; >> +}; >> + >> +static void handle_cec_message(struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec) >> +{ >> + struct cros_ec_device *cros_ec = cros_ec_cec->cros_ec; >> + uint8_t *cec_message = cros_ec->event_data.data.cec_message; >> + unsigned int len = cros_ec->event_size; >> + >> + cros_ec_cec->rx_msg.len = len; > > How robust is the underlying code and hardware? What happens if a > CEC message with more than 16 bytes is received? > > Hard to test unless you have an RPi3 set up as a CEC debugger. See > last section in https://hverkuil.home.xs4all.nl/cec-status.txt. > > Since you worked with CEC for a while now I recommend you set up such > a system. It's cheap and very useful. I will definitely setup this kind of system, I tried using am Amlogic SoC, but it really can't monitor the bus.... But I also have an ST STM32F0 Development board with double HDMI connector to develop CEC, I'll maybe try to use it for that purpose. > >> + memcpy(cros_ec_cec->rx_msg.msg, cec_message, len); >> + >> + cec_received_msg(cros_ec_cec->adap, &cros_ec_cec->rx_msg); >> +} >> + >> +static void handle_cec_event(struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec) >> +{ >> + struct cros_ec_device *cros_ec = cros_ec_cec->cros_ec; >> + uint32_t events = cros_ec->event_data.data.cec_events; >> + >> + if (events & EC_MKBP_CEC_SEND_OK) >> + cec_transmit_attempt_done(cros_ec_cec->adap, >> + CEC_TX_STATUS_OK); >> + >> + if (events & EC_MKBP_CEC_SEND_FAILED) >> + cec_transmit_attempt_done(cros_ec_cec->adap, >> + CEC_TX_STATUS_ERROR); > > You said above that the HW takes care of all the message retries. > If that's the case, then you need to use cec_transmit_done here > and pass in status CEC_TX_STATUS_MAX_RETRIES | CEC_TX_STATUS_NACK. > The MAX_RETRIES flag tells the cec core that it shouldn't attempt > to retry the message because the HW already did that. > > NACK is better than ERROR if the hardware supports only an OK/FAIL > result. Ok, we were unsure about this, thanks for the clarification. > >> +} >> + >> +static int cros_ec_cec_event(struct notifier_block *nb, >> + unsigned long queued_during_suspend, void *_notify) >> +{ >> + struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec; >> + struct cros_ec_device *cros_ec; >> + >> + cros_ec_cec = container_of(nb, struct cros_ec_cec, notifier); >> + cros_ec = cros_ec_cec->cros_ec; >> + >> + if (cros_ec->event_data.event_type == EC_MKBP_CEC_EVENT) { >> + handle_cec_event(cros_ec_cec); >> + return NOTIFY_OK; >> + } >> + >> + if (cros_ec->event_data.event_type == EC_MKBP_EVENT_CEC_MESSAGE) { >> + handle_cec_message(cros_ec_cec); >> + return NOTIFY_OK; >> + } >> + >> + return NOTIFY_DONE; >> +} >> + >> +static int cros_ec_cec_set_log_addr(struct cec_adapter *adap, u8 logical_addr) >> +{ >> + struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec = adap->priv; >> + struct cros_ec_device *cros_ec = cros_ec_cec->cros_ec; >> + struct { >> + struct cros_ec_command msg; >> + struct ec_params_cec_set data; >> + } __packed msg; > > Just say: ... msg = {}; > >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + if (logical_addr == CEC_LOG_ADDR_INVALID) >> + return 0; > > This looks weird. If I had configured a LA before, then this should unconfigure > it. But it just keeps the existing LA, so any poll messages to us will still > be Acked. Or am I missing something? > >> + >> + memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg)); > > and you can drop this memset. I always forget this trick. > >> + msg.msg.command = EC_CMD_CEC_SET; >> + msg.msg.outsize = sizeof(msg.data); >> + msg.data.cmd = CEC_CMD_LOGICAL_ADDRESS; >> + msg.data.address = logical_addr; >> + >> + ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(cros_ec, &msg.msg); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(cros_ec->dev, >> + "error setting CEC logical address on EC: %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int cros_ec_cec_transmit(struct cec_adapter *adap, u8 attempts, >> + u32 signal_free_time, struct cec_msg *cec_msg) >> +{ >> + struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec = adap->priv; >> + struct cros_ec_device *cros_ec = cros_ec_cec->cros_ec; >> + struct { >> + struct cros_ec_command msg; >> + struct ec_params_cec_write data; >> + } __packed msg; > > ... msg = {}; > >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + if (cec_msg->len > MAX_CEC_MSG_LEN) >> + return -EINVAL; > > No need, can never happen. Forgor to remove it, the API changed in the meantime, now it can never happen ! > >> + >> + memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg)); > > and drop this. > >> + msg.msg.command = EC_CMD_CEC_WRITE_MSG; >> + msg.msg.outsize = cec_msg->len; >> + memcpy(msg.data.msg, cec_msg->msg, cec_msg->len); >> + >> + ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(cros_ec, &msg.msg); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(cros_ec->dev, >> + "error writting CEC msg on EC: %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int cros_ec_cec_adap_enable(struct cec_adapter *adap, bool enable) >> +{ >> + struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec = adap->priv; >> + struct cros_ec_device *cros_ec = cros_ec_cec->cros_ec; >> + struct { >> + struct cros_ec_command msg; >> + struct ec_params_cec_set data; >> + } __packed msg; >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg)); >> + msg.msg.command = EC_CMD_CEC_SET; >> + msg.msg.outsize = sizeof(msg.data); >> + msg.data.cmd = CEC_CMD_ENABLE; >> + msg.data.enable = enable; >> + >> + ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(cros_ec, &msg.msg); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(cros_ec->dev, >> + "error %sabling CEC on EC: %d\n", >> + (enable ? "en" : "dis"), ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static const struct cec_adap_ops cros_ec_cec_ops = { >> + .adap_enable = cros_ec_cec_adap_enable, >> + .adap_log_addr = cros_ec_cec_set_log_addr, >> + .adap_transmit = cros_ec_cec_transmit, >> +}; >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> +static int cros_ec_cec_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); >> + struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev); >> + >> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) >> + enable_irq_wake(cros_ec_cec->cros_ec->irq); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int cros_ec_cec_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); >> + struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev); >> + >> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) >> + disable_irq_wake(cros_ec_cec->cros_ec->irq); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> +#endif >> + >> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cros_ec_cec_pm_ops, >> + cros_ec_cec_suspend, cros_ec_cec_resume); >> + >> + >> +struct cec_dmi_match { >> + char *sys_vendor; >> + char *product_name; >> + char *devname; >> + char *conn; >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct cec_dmi_match cec_dmi_match_table[] = { >> + /* Google Fizz */ >> + { "Google", "Fizz", "0000:00:02.0", "HDMI-A-1" }, >> +}; >> + >> +static int cros_ec_cec_get_notifier(struct cec_notifier **notify) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cec_dmi_match_table) ; ++i) { >> + const struct cec_dmi_match *m = &cec_dmi_match_table[i]; >> + >> + if (dmi_match(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, m->sys_vendor) && >> + dmi_match(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, m->product_name)) { >> + *notify = cec_notifier_get_byname(m->devname, m->conn); > > See my comments for patch 2/5. I will change with you comment, looks way cleaner. > >> + return 0; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +static int cros_ec_cec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct cros_ec_dev *ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); >> + struct cros_ec_device *cros_ec = ec_dev->ec_dev; >> + struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec; >> + unsigned int cec_caps = CEC_CAP_DEFAULTS; > > Does this need CEC_CAP_NEEDS_HPD? Can it still use CEC if there is no HPD > signal? No, Yes, the EC FW is independent of the HPD status > >> + int ret; >> + >> + cros_ec_cec = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cros_ec_cec), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!cros_ec_cec) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cros_ec_cec); >> + cros_ec_cec->cros_ec = cros_ec; >> + >> + ret = cros_ec_cec_get_notifier(&cros_ec_cec->notify); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "no CEC notifier available\n"); >> + cec_caps |= CEC_CAP_PHYS_ADDR; > > Can this happen? What hardware has this? I am strongly opposed to CEC drivers > using this capability unless there is no other option. It's a pain for userspace. It's in case an HW having a CEC capable FW but not in the cec_dmi_match_table, in this case it won't fail but still enable the CEC interface without a notifier. > >> + } else if (!cros_ec_cec->notify) { >> + return -EPROBE_DEFER; >> + } >> + >> + ret = device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to initialize wakeup\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + cros_ec_cec->adap = cec_allocate_adapter(&cros_ec_cec_ops, cros_ec_cec, >> + DRV_NAME, cec_caps, 1); >> + if (IS_ERR(cros_ec_cec->adap)) >> + return PTR_ERR(cros_ec_cec->adap); >> + >> + cros_ec_cec->adap->owner = THIS_MODULE; > > This can be dropped, cec_register_adapter() sets this already. Noted. > >> + >> + /* Get CEC events from the EC. */ >> + cros_ec_cec->notifier.notifier_call = cros_ec_cec_event; >> + ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&cros_ec->event_notifier, >> + &cros_ec_cec->notifier); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register notifier\n"); >> + cec_delete_adapter(cros_ec_cec->adap); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + ret = cec_register_adapter(cros_ec_cec->adap, &pdev->dev); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + cec_delete_adapter(cros_ec_cec->adap); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + cec_register_cec_notifier(cros_ec_cec->adap, cros_ec_cec->notify); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int cros_ec_cec_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct cros_ec_cec *cros_ec_cec = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister( >> + &cros_ec_cec->cros_ec->event_notifier, >> + &cros_ec_cec->notifier); >> + >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to unregister notifier\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + cec_unregister_adapter(cros_ec_cec->adap); >> + >> + if (cros_ec_cec->notify) >> + cec_notifier_put(cros_ec_cec->notify); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static struct platform_driver cros_ec_cec_driver = { >> + .probe = cros_ec_cec_probe, >> + .remove = cros_ec_cec_remove, >> + .driver = { >> + .name = DRV_NAME, >> + .pm = &cros_ec_cec_pm_ops, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +module_platform_driver(cros_ec_cec_driver); >> + >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("CEC driver for Chrome OS ECs"); >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>"); >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); >> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:" DRV_NAME); >> > > Regards, > > Hans > Thanks, Neil