Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:12:34PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>> How related lirc-core to the current lirc code? If it is not the same >>> maybe we should not call it lirc to avoid confusion. >> Just for better illustrate what I'm seeing, I broke the IR generic >> code into two components: >> >> lirc core - the module that receives raw pulse/space and creates >> a device to receive raw API pulse/space events; >> >> IR core - the module that receives scancodes, convert them into >> keycodes and send via evdev interface. >> >> We may change latter the nomenclature, but I'm seeing the core as two different >> modules, since there are cases where lirc core won't be used (those >> devices were there's no way to get pulse/space events). >> > > OK, I think we are close but not exactly close. I believe that what you > call lirc core will be used always - it is the code that create3s class > devices, connectes decorers with the data streams, etc. I believe it > will be utilized even in case of devices using hardware decoders. That > is why we should probably stop calling it "lirc core" just tso we don't > confuse it with original lirc. > > Then we have decoders and lirc_dev - which implements original lirc > interface (or maybe its modified version) and allows lircd to continue > working. > > Lastly we have what you call IR core which is IR-to-input bridge of > sorts. It seems to be just nomenclacure ;) what I called "IR core" you called "lirc core" what I called "lirc core" you called "lirc_dev" What I called IR core is the one that will be used by every IR driver, handling sysfs, evdev's, calling decoders, etc. I opted to use the nomenclature Lirc to the part of the IR subsystem that will create the Lirc interface. Currently, I almost finished the evdev part of the "IR core", using the current API to control the dynamic keycode allocation. It is already working fine with V4L drivers. Cheers, Mauro. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
