Dear reviewers, As the dt-binding patch has been accepted, would any help set the driver patch be accepted too? Any missing action from my side blocked the process. Thanks in advance. media: dw9807: Add dw9807 vcm driver https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/49159/ Regards, Andy -----Original Message----- From: Sakari Ailus [mailto:sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 5:37 AM To: Yeh, Andy <andy.yeh@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx; jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx; Chiang, AlanX <alanx.chiang@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v9 1/2] media: dt-bindings: Add bindings for Dongwoon DW9807 voice coil On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:53:47PM +0800, Andy Yeh wrote: > From: Alan Chiang <alanx.chiang@xxxxxxxxx> > > Dongwoon DW9807 is a voice coil lens driver. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Yeh <andy.yeh@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx> I don't remember seeing these two on the first patch nor giving mine. For what it's worth, I've applied v8 to my tree here: <URL:https://git.linuxtv.org/sailus/media_tree.git/log/?h=for-4.18-3> I.e. there's no need to resend the same patch to just add the regular acked-by or reviewed-by tags. "RESEND" in the subject suggests you're sending exactly the same patch, and in that case the version would be unchanged as well. > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/dongwoon,dw9807.txt | 9 > +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/dongwoon,dw9807.txt > > diff --git > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/dongwoon,dw9807.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/dongwoon,dw9807.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..0a1a860 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/dongwoon,dw9807.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ > +Dongwoon Anatech DW9807 voice coil lens driver > + > +DW9807 is a 10-bit DAC with current sink capability. It is intended > +for controlling voice coil lenses. > + > +Mandatory properties: > + > +- compatible: "dongwoon,dw9807" > +- reg: I2C slave address -- Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- Begin Message ---
- Subject: [linux-media] Patch notification: 3 patches updated
- From: Patchwork <patchwork@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 15:51:02 +0000
Hello, The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork: * linux-media: [RESEND,v8,1/2] media: dt-bindings: Add bindings for Dongwoon DW9807 voice coil - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/49028/ - for: Linux Media kernel patches was: New now: Accepted * linux-media: [RESEND,v9,1/2] media: dt-bindings: Add bindings for Dongwoon DW9807 voice coil - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/49158/ - for: Linux Media kernel patches was: New now: Accepted * linux-media: RESEND[PATCH v6 1/2] media: dt-bindings: Add bindings for Dongwoon DW9807 voice coil - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/47979/ - for: Linux Media kernel patches was: New now: Accepted This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond. - Patches submitted to linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx have the following possible states: New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches); Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically, the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML; Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was superseeded by a git pull request. Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't exist anymore. Changes requested: when someone requests changes of the patch; Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch. RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes: - patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches via git pull requests; - patches with a very active community (typically from developers working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be happy with. TODO: A variant of RFC. It keeps the patch visible at patchwork main screen, allowing to better track it. Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applied via the media-tree.git. Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems, etc); If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML. - This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit your mail settings at: http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/
--- End Message ---
