On 25/04/18 13:02, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Tomi, > > On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 12:33:53 EEST Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> On 25/04/18 12:03, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> Could we trim down omapfb to remove support for the devices supported by >>> omapdrm ? >> >> I was thinking about just that. But, of course, it's not quite >> straightforward either. >> >> We've got DSI manual update functionality in OMAP3-OMAP5 SoCs, which >> covers a lot of devices. > > Sebastian is working on getting that feature in omapdrm, isn't he ? Yes, and I keep pushing it forward because of the restructuring you're doing =) (feel free to comment on that thread). But agreed, it's getting better. When we have manual update support, I think the biggest missing feature is then in omapdrm. >> And VRFB on OMAP2/3. > > And that's something I'd really like to have in omapdrm too. Considering how much headache TILER has given, I'm not exactly looking forward to it ;). If we get manual update and VRFB, I think we are more or less covered on the supported HW features. It'll still break userspace apps which use omapfb, though. Unless we also port the omapfb specific IOCTLs and the sysfs files, which I believe we should not. Tomi -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
