Hi Guennadi,
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 12:30:44 EEST Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> Thanks for the review. As soon as the second patch has also been reviewed,
> I'll work on both of them.
I would have sworn I had sent the review for 2/2 as well. I'll get to it right
away.
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Guennadi,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Friday, 23 March 2018 11:24:00 EET Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
> > >
> > > UVC defines a method of handling asynchronous controls, which sends a
> > > USB packet over the interrupt pipe. This patch implements support for
> > > such packets by sending a control event to the user. Since this can
> > > involve USB traffic and, therefore, scheduling, this has to be done
> > > in a work queue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c | 166
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c | 4 +-
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h | 15 +++-
> > > include/uapi/linux/uvcvideo.h | 2 +
> > > 5 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > > b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c index 4042cbdb721b..f4773c56438c
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/videodev2.h>
> > > #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > > #include <linux/wait.h>
> > >
> > > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > >
> > > #include <linux/atomic.h>
> > > #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -1222,30 +1223,134 @@ static void uvc_ctrl_send_event(struct uvc_fh
> > > *handle, {
> > >
> > > struct v4l2_subscribed_event *sev;
> > > struct v4l2_event ev;
> > >
> > > + bool autoupdate;
> > >
> > > if (list_empty(&mapping->ev_subs))
> > >
> > > return;
> > >
> > > + if (!handle) {
> >
> > In which circumstances does this happen ? Is it when the device reports a
> > control change event without an prior control set ? Have you seen that
> > happening in practice ?
> >
> > > + autoupdate = true;
> > > + sev = list_first_entry(&mapping->ev_subs,
> > > + struct v4l2_subscribed_event, node);
> > > + handle = container_of(sev->fh, struct uvc_fh, vfh);
> >
> > There's a check below that guards against sev->fh being NULL. Could
> > sev->fh be NULL here ?
> >
> > > + } else {
> > > + autoupdate = false;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > >
> > > uvc_ctrl_fill_event(handle->chain, &ev, ctrl, mapping, value,
> > > changes);
> > >
> > > list_for_each_entry(sev, &mapping->ev_subs, node) {
> > >
> > > if (sev->fh && (sev->fh != &handle->vfh ||
> > >
> > > (sev->flags & V4L2_EVENT_SUB_FL_ALLOW_FEEDBACK) ||
> > >
> > > - (changes & V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_FLAGS)))
> > > + (changes & V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_FLAGS) || autoupdate))
> > >
> > > v4l2_event_queue_fh(sev->fh, &ev);
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void uvc_ctrl_send_slave_event(struct uvc_fh *handle,
> > > - struct uvc_control *master, u32 slave_id,
> > > - const struct v4l2_ext_control *xctrls, unsigned int xctrls_count)
> > > +static void __uvc_ctrl_send_slave_event(struct uvc_fh *handle,
> > > + struct uvc_control *master, u32 slave_id)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > struct uvc_control_mapping *mapping = NULL;
> > > struct uvc_control *ctrl = NULL;
> > > u32 changes = V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_FLAGS;
> > >
> > > - unsigned int i;
> > >
> > > s32 val = 0;
> > >
> > > + __uvc_find_control(master->entity, slave_id, &mapping, &ctrl, 0);
> > > + if (ctrl == NULL)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + if (__uvc_ctrl_get(handle->chain, ctrl, mapping, &val) == 0)
> > > + changes |= V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_VALUE;
> > > +
> > > + uvc_ctrl_send_event(handle, ctrl, mapping, val, changes);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void uvc_ctrl_status_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > +{
> > > + struct uvc_device *dev = container_of(work, struct uvc_device,
> > > + async_ctrl.work);
> > > + struct uvc_video_chain *chain;
> > > + struct uvc_ctrl_work *w = &dev->async_ctrl;
> > > + struct uvc_control_mapping *mapping;
> > > + struct uvc_control *ctrl;
> > > + struct uvc_fh *handle;
> > > + unsigned int i;
> > > + u8 *data;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irq(&w->lock);
> > > + data = w->data;
> > > + w->data = NULL;
> > > + chain = w->chain;
> > > + ctrl = w->ctrl;
> > > + handle = ctrl->handle;
> > > + ctrl->handle = NULL;
> > > + spin_unlock_irq(&w->lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&chain->ctrl_mutex))
> > > + goto free;
> >
> > This will result in the event being lost, which isn't very nice (see below
> > for additional comments on this topic). Can't we use mutex_lock() ?
> >
> > > +
> > > + list_for_each_entry(mapping, &ctrl->info.mappings, list) {
> > > + s32 value = mapping->get(mapping, UVC_GET_CUR, data);
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mapping->slave_ids); ++i) {
> > > + if (!mapping->slave_ids[i])
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > + __uvc_ctrl_send_slave_event(handle, ctrl,
> > > + mapping->slave_ids[i]);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (mapping->v4l2_type == V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_MENU) {
> > > + struct uvc_menu_info *menu = mapping->menu_info;
> > > + unsigned int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < mapping->menu_count; ++i, ++menu)
> > > + if (menu->value == value) {
> > > + value = i;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> >
> > Would this be useful to move the mapping->get() and menu control handling
> > code out of __uvc_ctrl_get() into a __uvc_ctrl_get_value() function and
> > call it here ?
> >
> > > + uvc_ctrl_send_event(handle, ctrl, mapping, value,
> > > + V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_VALUE);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + mutex_unlock(&chain->ctrl_mutex);
> > > +
> > > +free:
> > > + kfree(data);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void uvc_ctrl_status_event(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> > > + struct uvc_control *ctrl, u8 *data, size_t len)
> > > +{
> > > + struct uvc_device *dev = chain->dev;
> > > + struct uvc_ctrl_work *w = &dev->async_ctrl;
> > > +
> > > + if (list_empty(&ctrl->info.mappings))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock(&w->lock);
> > > + if (w->data)
> > > + /* A previous event work hasn't run yet, we lose 1 event */
> > > + kfree(w->data);
> >
> > I really don't like losing events :/
> >
> > > + w->data = kmalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> >
> > GFP_ATOMIC allocation isn't very nice either.
> >
> > How about if we instead delayed resubmitting the status URB until the
> > event is fully processed by the work queue ? That way we wouldn't lose
> > events, we wouldn't need memory allocation in atomic context, and if the
> > work queue becomes a bottleneck we could even queue multiple status URBs
> > and easily add them to a list for processing by the work queue.
> >
> > > + if (w->data) {
> > > + memcpy(w->data, data, len);
> > > + w->chain = chain;
> > > + w->ctrl = ctrl;
> > > + schedule_work(&w->work);
> > > + }
> > > + spin_unlock(&w->lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void uvc_ctrl_send_slave_event(struct uvc_fh *handle,
> > > + struct uvc_control *master, u32 slave_id,
> > > + const struct v4l2_ext_control *xctrls, unsigned int xctrls_count)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int i;
> > > +
> > >
> > > /*
> > >
> > > * We can skip sending an event for the slave if the slave
> > > * is being modified in the same transaction.
> > >
> > > @@ -1255,14 +1360,7 @@ static void uvc_ctrl_send_slave_event(struct
> > > uvc_fh
> > > *handle, return;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > - __uvc_find_control(master->entity, slave_id, &mapping, &ctrl, 0);
> > > - if (ctrl == NULL)
> > > - return;
> > > -
> > > - if (__uvc_ctrl_get(handle->chain, ctrl, mapping, &val) == 0)
> > > - changes |= V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_VALUE;
> > > -
> > > - uvc_ctrl_send_event(handle, ctrl, mapping, val, changes);
> > > + __uvc_ctrl_send_slave_event(handle, master, slave_id);
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void uvc_ctrl_send_events(struct uvc_fh *handle,
> > >
> > > @@ -1277,6 +1375,10 @@ static void uvc_ctrl_send_events(struct uvc_fh
> > > *handle, for (i = 0; i < xctrls_count; ++i) {
> > >
> > > ctrl = uvc_find_control(handle->chain, xctrls[i].id, &mapping);
> > >
> > > + if (ctrl->info.flags & UVC_CTRL_FLAG_ASYNCHRONOUS)
> > > + /* Notification will be sent from an Interrupt event */
> >
> > Nitpicking, could you add a period at the end of sentences to match the
> > comment style in the driver ?
> >
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > >
> > > for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(mapping->slave_ids); ++j) {
> > >
> > > if (!mapping->slave_ids[j])
> > >
> > > break;
> > >
> > > @@ -1472,9 +1574,10 @@ int uvc_ctrl_get(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> > >
> > > return __uvc_ctrl_get(chain, ctrl, mapping, &xctrl->value);
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > -int uvc_ctrl_set(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> > > +int uvc_ctrl_set(struct uvc_fh *handle,
> > >
> > > struct v4l2_ext_control *xctrl)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > + struct uvc_video_chain *chain = handle->chain;
> > >
> > > struct uvc_control *ctrl;
> > > struct uvc_control_mapping *mapping;
> > > s32 value;
> > >
> > > @@ -1488,6 +1591,25 @@ int uvc_ctrl_set(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> > >
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > if (!(ctrl->info.flags & UVC_CTRL_FLAG_SET_CUR))
> > >
> > > return -EACCES;
> > >
> > > + if (ctrl->info.flags & UVC_CTRL_FLAG_ASYNCHRONOUS) {
> > > + if (ctrl->handle)
> > > + /*
> > > + * We have already sent this control to the camera
> > > + * recently and are currently waiting for a completion
> > > + * notification. The camera might already have completed
> > > + * its processing and is ready to accept a new control
> > > + * or it's still busy processing. If we send a new
> > > + * instance of this control now, in the former case the
> > > + * camera will process this one too and we'll get
> > > + * completions for both, but we will only deliver an
> > > + * event for one of them back to the user. In the latter
> > > + * case the camera will reply with a STALL. It's easier
> > > + * and more reliable to return an error now and let the
> > > + * user retry.
> > > + */
> > > + return -EBUSY;
> > > + ctrl->handle = handle;
> >
> > This part worries me. If the control change event isn't received for any
> > reason (such as a buggy device for instance, or uvc_ctrl_status_event()
> > being called with the previous event not processed yet), the control will
> > stay busy forever.
> >
> > I see two approaches to fix this. One would be to forward all received
> > control change events to all file handles unconditionally and remove the
> > handle field from the uvc_control structure. Another one would be to add
> > a timeout, storing the time at which the control has been set in the
> > uvc_control structure, and checking whether the time difference exceeds a
> > fixed timeout here. We could also combine the two, replacing the handle
> > field with a timestamp field.
> >
> > Please keep in mind if trying this out that simply storing jiffies as a
> > timestamp might cause counter overflow issues if the control is set, no
> > event is ever received, and a second control set happens much later after
> > one (or multiple) jiffies wraparounds. We could end up returning -EBUSY
> > incorrectly. That might not be a real issue given the size of the jiffies
> > counter though, I'll let you double-check.
> >
> > > + }
> > >
> > > /* Clamp out of range values. */
> > > switch (mapping->v4l2_type) {
> > >
> > > @@ -1612,7 +1734,9 @@ static int uvc_ctrl_get_flags(struct uvc_device
> > > *dev,
> > >
> > > | (data[0] & UVC_CONTROL_CAP_SET ?
> > >
> > > UVC_CTRL_FLAG_SET_CUR : 0)
> > >
> > > | (data[0] & UVC_CONTROL_CAP_AUTOUPDATE ?
> > >
> > > - UVC_CTRL_FLAG_AUTO_UPDATE : 0);
> > > + UVC_CTRL_FLAG_AUTO_UPDATE : 0)
> > > + | (data[0] & UVC_CONTROL_CAP_ASYNCHRONOUS ?
> > > + UVC_CTRL_FLAG_ASYNCHRONOUS : 0);
> > >
> > > kfree(data);
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -2158,6 +2282,13 @@ static void uvc_ctrl_init_ctrl(struct uvc_device
> > > *dev, struct uvc_control *ctrl) if (!ctrl->initialized)
> > >
> > > return;
> > >
> > > + /* Temporarily abuse DATA_CURRENT buffer to avoid 1 byte allocation
*/
> > > + if (!uvc_query_ctrl(dev, UVC_GET_INFO, ctrl->entity->id,
> > > + dev->intfnum, info->selector,
> > > + uvc_ctrl_data(ctrl, UVC_CTRL_DATA_CURRENT), 1) &&
> > > + uvc_ctrl_data(ctrl, UVC_CTRL_DATA_CURRENT)[0] & 0x10)
> > > + ctrl->info.flags |= UVC_CTRL_FLAG_ASYNCHRONOUS;
> >
> > I think this isn't needed anymore as the uvc_ctrl_add_info() function now
> > calls uvc_ctrl_get_flags() to update the flags. Could you please confirm ?
> >
> > > for (; mapping < mend; ++mapping) {
> > >
> > > if (uvc_entity_match_guid(ctrl->entity, mapping->entity) &&
> > >
> > > ctrl->info.selector == mapping->selector)
> > >
> > > @@ -2173,6 +2304,9 @@ int uvc_ctrl_init_device(struct uvc_device *dev)
> > >
> > > struct uvc_entity *entity;
> > > unsigned int i;
> > >
> > > + spin_lock_init(&dev->async_ctrl.lock);
> > > + INIT_WORK(&dev->async_ctrl.work, uvc_ctrl_status_event_work);
> > > +
> > >
> > > /* Walk the entities list and instantiate controls */
> > > list_for_each_entry(entity, &dev->entities, list) {
> > >
> > > struct uvc_control *ctrl;
> > >
> > > @@ -2241,6 +2375,8 @@ void uvc_ctrl_cleanup_device(struct uvc_device
> > > *dev)
> > >
> > > struct uvc_entity *entity;
> > > unsigned int i;
> > >
> > > + cancel_work_sync(&dev->async_ctrl.work);
> > > +
> > >
> > > /* Free controls and control mappings for all entities. */
> > > list_for_each_entry(entity, &dev->entities, list) {
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < entity->ncontrols; ++i) {
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> > > b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c index 7b710410584a..d1d83aed6a1d
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> > > @@ -78,7 +78,24 @@ static void uvc_input_report_key(struct uvc_device
> > > *dev,
> > > unsigned int code, /*
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > * Status interrupt endpoint
> > >
> > > */
> > >
> > > -static void uvc_event_streaming(struct uvc_device *dev, u8 *data, int
> > > len)
> > > +struct uvc_streaming_status {
> > > + u8 bStatusType;
> > > + u8 bOriginator;
> > > + u8 bEvent;
> > > + u8 bValue[];
> > > +} __packed;
> > > +
> > > +struct uvc_control_status {
> > > + u8 bStatusType;
> > > + u8 bOriginator;
> > > + u8 bEvent;
> > > + u8 bSelector;
> > > + u8 bAttribute;
> > > + u8 bValue[];
> > > +} __packed;
> > > +
> > > +static void uvc_event_streaming(struct uvc_device *dev,
> > > + struct uvc_streaming_status *status, int len)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > if (len < 3) {
> > >
> > > uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_STATUS, "Invalid streaming status event "
> > >
> > > @@ -86,31 +103,101 @@ static void uvc_event_streaming(struct uvc_device
> > > *dev, u8 *data, int len) return;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (data[2] == 0) {
> > > + if (status->bEvent == 0) {
> > >
> > > if (len < 4)
> > >
> > > return;
> > >
> > > uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_STATUS, "Button (intf %u) %s len %d\n",
> > >
> > > - data[1], data[3] ? "pressed" : "released", len);
> > > - uvc_input_report_key(dev, KEY_CAMERA, data[3]);
> > > + status->bOriginator,
> > > + status->bValue[0] ? "pressed" : "released", len);
> > > + uvc_input_report_key(dev, KEY_CAMERA, status->bValue[0]);
> > >
> > > } else {
> > >
> > > uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_STATUS,
> > >
> > > "Stream %u error event %02x len %d.\n",
> > >
> > > - data[1], data[2], len);
> > > + status->bOriginator, status->bEvent, len);
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void uvc_event_control(struct uvc_device *dev, u8 *data, int
> > > len)
> > > +#define UVC_CTRL_VALUE_CHANGE 0
> > > +#define UVC_CTRL_INFO_CHANGE 1
> > > +#define UVC_CTRL_FAILURE_CHANGE 2
> > > +#define UVC_CTRL_MIN_CHANGE 3
> > > +#define UVC_CTRL_MAX_CHANGE 4
> > > +
> > > +static struct uvc_control *uvc_event_entity_ctrl(struct uvc_entity
> > > *entity, + u8 selector)
> >
> > Should this be named uvc_event_entity_find_ctrl() ?
> >
> > > +{
> > > + struct uvc_control *ctrl;
> > > + unsigned int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0, ctrl = entity->controls; i < entity->ncontrols; i++,
> > > ctrl++)
> > > + if (ctrl->info.selector == selector)
> > > + return ctrl;
> > > +
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct uvc_control *uvc_event_find_ctrl(struct uvc_device *dev,
> > > + struct uvc_control_status *status,
> > > + struct uvc_video_chain **chain)
> > > +{
> > > + list_for_each_entry((*chain), &dev->chains, list) {
> >
> > Do you need parentheses around *chain ?
> >
> > > + struct uvc_entity *entity;
> > > + struct uvc_control *ctrl;
> > > +
> > > + list_for_each_entry(entity, &(*chain)->entities, chain) {
> > > + if (entity->id == status->bOriginator) {
> >
> > If you invert the check here with
> >
> > if (entity->id == status->bOriginator)
> >
> > continue;
> >
> > you'll gain one level of indentation and you might be able to inline
> > uvc_event_entity_ctrl(). Up to you.
> >
> > > + ctrl = uvc_event_entity_ctrl(entity,
> > > + status->bSelector);
> > > + /*
> > > + * Some buggy cameras send asynchronous Control
> > > + * Change events for control, other than the
> > > + * ones, that had been changed, even though the
> > > + * AutoUpdate flag isn't set for the control.
> > > + */
> >
> > That's lots of commas, I'm not sure what you mean here. Are there cameras
> > that send event for controls that haven't changed ? Or cameras that send
> > events for controls that don't have the auto-update flag set ? Do you
> > know what cameras are affected ?
> >
> > > + if (ctrl && (!ctrl->handle ||
> > > + ctrl->handle->chain == *chain))
> > > + return ctrl;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void uvc_event_control(struct uvc_device *dev,
> > > + struct uvc_control_status *status, int len)
> >
> > While at it you can make the status pointer const.
> >
> > > {
> > >
> > > - char *attrs[3] = { "value", "info", "failure" };
> > > + struct uvc_video_chain *chain;
> > > + struct uvc_control *ctrl;
> > > + char *attrs[] = { "value", "info", "failure", "min", "max" };
> >
> > You can also make these static const (and while at it could you please
> > move
> > them before the other two variables ?).
> >
> > > - if (len < 6 || data[2] != 0 || data[4] > 2) {
> > > + if (len < 6 || status->bEvent != 0 ||
> > > + status->bAttribute >= ARRAY_SIZE(attrs)) {
> > >
> > > uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_STATUS, "Invalid control status event "
> > >
> > > "received.\n");
> > >
> > > return;
> >
> > The min and max events are only defined in UVC 1.5 but I suppose there's
> > no
> > need to check for the UVC version here, it won't hurt to handle them on
> > UVC
> > 1.1 as well as they should not occur.
> >
> > > }
> > >
> > > uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_STATUS, "Control %u/%u %s change len %d.\n",
> > >
> > > - data[1], data[3], attrs[data[4]], len);
> > > + status->bOriginator, status->bSelector,
> > > + attrs[status->bAttribute], len);
> > > +
> > > + /* Find the control. */
> > > + ctrl = uvc_event_find_ctrl(dev, status, &chain);
> > > + if (!ctrl)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + switch (status->bAttribute) {
> > > + case UVC_CTRL_VALUE_CHANGE:
> > > + uvc_ctrl_status_event(chain, ctrl, status->bValue, len -
> > > + offsetof(struct uvc_control_status, bValue));
> > > + break;
> >
> > How about a blank line here ?
> >
> > > + case UVC_CTRL_INFO_CHANGE:
> > > + case UVC_CTRL_FAILURE_CHANGE:
> > > + case UVC_CTRL_MIN_CHANGE:
> > > + case UVC_CTRL_MAX_CHANGE:
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void uvc_status_complete(struct urb *urb)
> > >
> > > @@ -139,11 +226,13 @@ static void uvc_status_complete(struct urb *urb)
> > >
> > > if (len > 0) {
> > >
> > > switch (dev->status[0] & 0x0f) {
> > >
> > > case UVC_STATUS_TYPE_CONTROL:
> > > - uvc_event_control(dev, dev->status, len);
> > > + uvc_event_control(dev,
> > > + (struct uvc_control_status *)dev->status, len);
> >
> > Is dev->status guaranteed to be aligned properly so that no unaligned
> > access fault can occur when dereferencing memory through the
> > uvc_control_status and uvc_streaming_status structures ? Unaligned access
> > are the reason why UVC descriptors are parsed manually instead of through
> > a structure.
> >
> > > break;
> > >
> > > case UVC_STATUS_TYPE_STREAMING:
> > > - uvc_event_streaming(dev, dev->status, len);
> > > + uvc_event_streaming(dev,
> > > + (struct uvc_streaming_status *)dev->status, len);
> > >
> > > break;
> > >
> > > default:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > > b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c index 818a4369a51a..55f973eb16eb
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > > @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_s_ctrl(struct file *file, void
> > > *fh, if (ret < 0)
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > - ret = uvc_ctrl_set(chain, &xctrl);
> > > + ret = uvc_ctrl_set(handle, &xctrl);
> > >
> > > if (ret < 0) {
> > >
> > > uvc_ctrl_rollback(handle);
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_s_try_ext_ctrls(struct uvc_fh
> > > *handle, return ret;
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < ctrls->count; ++ctrl, ++i) {
> > >
> > > - ret = uvc_ctrl_set(chain, ctrl);
> > > + ret = uvc_ctrl_set(handle, ctrl);
> > >
> > > if (ret < 0) {
> > >
> > > uvc_ctrl_rollback(handle);
> > > ctrls->error_idx = commit ? ctrls->count : i;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > > b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h index 6b955e0dd956..483182fe1b4d
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/usb/video.h>
> > > #include <linux/uvcvideo.h>
> > > #include <linux/videodev2.h>
> > >
> > > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > >
> > > #include <media/media-device.h>
> > > #include <media/v4l2-device.h>
> > > #include <media/v4l2-event.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -259,6 +260,8 @@ struct uvc_control {
> > >
> > > initialized:1;
> > >
> > > u8 *uvc_data;
> > >
> > > +
> > > + struct uvc_fh *handle; /* Used for asynchronous event delivery */
> > >
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct uvc_format_desc {
> > >
> > > @@ -603,6 +606,14 @@ struct uvc_device {
> > >
> > > u8 *status;
> > > struct input_dev *input;
> > > char input_phys[64];
> > >
> > > +
> > > + struct uvc_ctrl_work {
> > > + struct work_struct work;
> > > + struct uvc_video_chain *chain;
> > > + struct uvc_control *ctrl;
> > > + spinlock_t lock;
> > > + void *data;
> > > + } async_ctrl;
> > >
> > > };
> > >
> > > enum uvc_handle_state {
> > >
> > > @@ -756,6 +767,8 @@ int uvc_ctrl_add_mapping(struct uvc_video_chain
> > > *chain,
> > >
> > > int uvc_ctrl_init_device(struct uvc_device *dev);
> > > void uvc_ctrl_cleanup_device(struct uvc_device *dev);
> > > int uvc_ctrl_restore_values(struct uvc_device *dev);
> > >
> > > +void uvc_ctrl_status_event(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> > > + struct uvc_control *ctrl, u8 *data, size_t len);
> > >
> > > int uvc_ctrl_begin(struct uvc_video_chain *chain);
> > > int __uvc_ctrl_commit(struct uvc_fh *handle, int rollback,
> > >
> > > @@ -773,7 +786,7 @@ static inline int uvc_ctrl_rollback(struct uvc_fh
> > > *handle) }
> > >
> > > int uvc_ctrl_get(struct uvc_video_chain *chain, struct v4l2_ext_control
> > >
> > > *xctrl); -int uvc_ctrl_set(struct uvc_video_chain *chain, struct
> > > v4l2_ext_control *xctrl); +int uvc_ctrl_set(struct uvc_fh *handle,
> > > struct
> > > v4l2_ext_control *xctrl);
> > >
> > > int uvc_xu_ctrl_query(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> > >
> > > struct uvc_xu_control_query *xqry);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/uvcvideo.h
> > > b/include/uapi/linux/uvcvideo.h
> > > index 020714d2c5bd..f80f05b3c423 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/uvcvideo.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/uvcvideo.h
> > > @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
> > >
> > > #define UVC_CTRL_FLAG_RESTORE (1 << 6)
> > > /* Control can be updated by the camera. */
> > > #define UVC_CTRL_FLAG_AUTO_UPDATE (1 << 7)
> > >
> > > +/* Control supports asynchronous reporting */
> > > +#define UVC_CTRL_FLAG_ASYNCHRONOUS (1 << 8)
> > >
> > > #define UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_RANGE \
> > >
> > > (UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_CUR | UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_MIN | \
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
