On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 4 April 2018 at 21:56, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200
>> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>> > On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer
>>> >> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code.
>>> >> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree either
>>> >> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next iterations
>>> >> of this serie.
>>> >
>>> > Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that
>>> > would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you
>>> > receive the needed acks of course.
>>> For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have all
>>
>> Especially since 3.17-rc1 has been released more than 3 years ago :-),
>> but I guess you meant 4.17-rc1.
>
> Yeah, I realize that I was a bit lost in time yesterday. Even more
> people have been having fun about it (me too). :-)
I occasionally still type 2.6.17 when I mean 4.17.
Arnd
