The current I2C error handling logic makes static analyzers confused, and it doesn't follow the coding style we're using: drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c:180 get_key_pixelview() error: uninitialized symbol 'b'. drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c:224 get_key_knc1() error: uninitialized symbol 'b'. drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c:226 get_key_knc1() error: uninitialized symbol 'b'. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c index 193020d64e51..1d11aab1817a 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c @@ -168,11 +168,15 @@ static int get_key_haup_xvr(struct IR_i2c *ir, enum rc_proto *protocol, static int get_key_pixelview(struct IR_i2c *ir, enum rc_proto *protocol, u32 *scancode, u8 *toggle) { + int rc; unsigned char b; /* poll IR chip */ - if (1 != i2c_master_recv(ir->c, &b, 1)) { + rc = i2c_master_recv(ir->c, &b, 1); + if (rc != 1) { dev_dbg(&ir->rc->dev, "read error\n"); + if (rc < 0) + return rc; return -EIO; } @@ -185,11 +189,15 @@ static int get_key_pixelview(struct IR_i2c *ir, enum rc_proto *protocol, static int get_key_fusionhdtv(struct IR_i2c *ir, enum rc_proto *protocol, u32 *scancode, u8 *toggle) { + int rc; unsigned char buf[4]; /* poll IR chip */ - if (4 != i2c_master_recv(ir->c, buf, 4)) { + rc = i2c_master_recv(ir->c, buf, 4); + if (rc != 4) { dev_dbg(&ir->rc->dev, "read error\n"); + if (rc < 0) + return rc; return -EIO; } @@ -209,11 +217,15 @@ static int get_key_fusionhdtv(struct IR_i2c *ir, enum rc_proto *protocol, static int get_key_knc1(struct IR_i2c *ir, enum rc_proto *protocol, u32 *scancode, u8 *toggle) { + int rc; unsigned char b; /* poll IR chip */ - if (1 != i2c_master_recv(ir->c, &b, 1)) { + rc = i2c_master_recv(ir->c, &b, 1); + if (rc != 1) { dev_dbg(&ir->rc->dev, "read error\n"); + if (rc < 0) + return rc; return -EIO; } -- 2.14.3