Hi Laurent, On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:00:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > + > > + Port Description > > + ----------------------------- > > + 0 CSI-2 output > > + 1 Stream 0 input > > + 2 Stream 1 input > > + 3 Stream 2 input > > + 4 Stream 3 input > > + > > + The stream input port nodes are optional if they are not > > + connected to anything at the hardware level or implemented > > + in the design. > > Are they optional (and thus valid if present), or should they be forbidden in > case they're not implemented in the hardware ? I'd go for the latter and write > > "One stream input port node is required per implemented hardware input, and no > stream input port node can be present for unimplemented inputs." That works for me. > > Since there is only one endpoint per port, > > + the endpoints are not numbered. > > I think it would be valid to number endpoints even if not required. I think > that what you should document is that at most one endpoint is supported per > port. Sakari asked to have it worded that way in this review: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg122713.html What should I do? Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature