Hi Hans,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 12:26:57 EET Hans Verkuil wrote:
> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ctrl_is_pointer just hardcoded two known string controls, but that
> caused problems when using e.g. custom controls that use a pointer
> for the payload.
>
> Reimplement this function: it now finds the v4l2_ctrl (if the driver
> uses the control framework) or it calls vidioc_query_ext_ctrl (if the
> driver implements that directly).
>
> In both cases it can now check if the control is a pointer control
> or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # for v4.15 and up
> ---
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c index
> 7dff9b4aeb19..30c5be1f0549 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
> #include <linux/videodev2.h>
> #include <linux/v4l2-subdev.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-dev.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-fh.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-ioctl.h>
>
> static long native_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long
> arg) @@ -601,24 +603,39 @@ struct v4l2_ext_control32 {
> };
> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> -/* The following function really belong in v4l2-common, but that causes
> - a circular dependency between modules. We need to think about this, but
> - for now this will do. */
> -
> -/* Return non-zero if this control is a pointer type. Currently only
> - type STRING is a pointer type. */
> -static inline int ctrl_is_pointer(u32 id)
> +/* Return true if this control is a pointer type. */
> +static inline bool ctrl_is_pointer(struct file *file, u32 id)
> {
> - switch (id) {
> - case V4L2_CID_RDS_TX_PS_NAME:
> - case V4L2_CID_RDS_TX_RADIO_TEXT:
> - return 1;
> - default:
> - return 0;
> + struct video_device *vdev = video_devdata(file);
> + struct v4l2_fh *fh = NULL;
> + struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *hdl = NULL;
> + struct v4l2_query_ext_ctrl qec = { id };
> + const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops *ops = vdev->ioctl_ops;
> +
> + if (test_bit(V4L2_FL_USES_V4L2_FH, &vdev->flags))
> + fh = file->private_data;
> +
> + if (fh && fh->ctrl_handler)
> + hdl = fh->ctrl_handler;
> + else if (vdev->ctrl_handler)
> + hdl = vdev->ctrl_handler;
> +
> + if (hdl) {
> + struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(hdl, id);
> +
> + return ctrl && ctrl->is_ptr;
> }
> +
> + if (!ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl)
> + return false;
> +
> + return !ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl(file, fh, &qec) &&
> + (qec.flags & V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_HAS_PAYLOAD);
Don't the subdev control ioctls go through this code path as well ? Unless I'm
mistaken neither ctrl_handler nor ioctl_ops will be set for the video_device
used to implement the subdev device node, so this will crash.
> }
>
> -static int get_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct v4l2_ext_controls *kp, struct
> v4l2_ext_controls32 __user *up) +static int get_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct
> file *file,
> + struct v4l2_ext_controls *kp,
> + struct v4l2_ext_controls32 __user *up)
> {
> struct v4l2_ext_control32 __user *ucontrols;
> struct v4l2_ext_control __user *kcontrols;
> @@ -651,7 +668,7 @@ static int get_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct
> v4l2_ext_controls *kp, struct v4l2_ext return -EFAULT;
> if (get_user(id, &kcontrols->id))
> return -EFAULT;
> - if (ctrl_is_pointer(id)) {
> + if (ctrl_is_pointer(file, id)) {
> void __user *s;
>
> if (get_user(p, &ucontrols->string))
> @@ -666,7 +683,9 @@ static int get_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct
> v4l2_ext_controls *kp, struct v4l2_ext return 0;
> }
>
> -static int put_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct v4l2_ext_controls *kp, struct
> v4l2_ext_controls32 __user *up) +static int put_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct
> file *file,
> + struct v4l2_ext_controls *kp,
> + struct v4l2_ext_controls32 __user *up)
> {
> struct v4l2_ext_control32 __user *ucontrols;
> struct v4l2_ext_control __user *kcontrols =
> @@ -698,7 +717,7 @@ static int put_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct
> v4l2_ext_controls *kp, struct v4l2_ext /* Do not modify the pointer when
> copying a pointer control.
> The contents of the pointer was changed, not the pointer
> itself. */
> - if (ctrl_is_pointer(id))
> + if (ctrl_is_pointer(file, id))
> size -= sizeof(ucontrols->value64);
> if (copy_in_user(ucontrols, kcontrols, size))
> return -EFAULT;
> @@ -912,7 +931,7 @@ static long do_video_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned
> int cmd, unsigned long ar case VIDIOC_G_EXT_CTRLS:
> case VIDIOC_S_EXT_CTRLS:
> case VIDIOC_TRY_EXT_CTRLS:
> - err = get_v4l2_ext_controls32(&karg.v2ecs, up);
> + err = get_v4l2_ext_controls32(file, &karg.v2ecs, up);
> compatible_arg = 0;
> break;
> case VIDIOC_DQEVENT:
> @@ -939,7 +958,7 @@ static long do_video_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned
> int cmd, unsigned long ar case VIDIOC_G_EXT_CTRLS:
> case VIDIOC_S_EXT_CTRLS:
> case VIDIOC_TRY_EXT_CTRLS:
> - if (put_v4l2_ext_controls32(&karg.v2ecs, up))
> + if (put_v4l2_ext_controls32(file, &karg.v2ecs, up))
> err = -EFAULT;
> break;
> case VIDIOC_S_EDID:
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
