On 22/01/18 11:28, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:18:49AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Create helpers to handle VIDIOC_G/S_PARM by querying the >> g/s_frame_interval v4l2_subdev ops. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/media/v4l2-common.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c >> index 8650ad92b64d..4e371ae4aed7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c >> @@ -392,3 +392,52 @@ void v4l2_get_timestamp(struct timeval *tv) >> tv->tv_usec = ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(v4l2_get_timestamp); >> + >> +int v4l2_g_parm_cap(struct video_device *vdev, >> + struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_streamparm *a) >> +{ >> + struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval ival = { 0 }; >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (a->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE && >> + a->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + if (vdev->device_caps & V4L2_CAP_READWRITE) >> + a->parm.capture.readbuffers = 2; >> + if (v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, video, g_frame_interval)) >> + a->parm.capture.capability = V4L2_CAP_TIMEPERFRAME; >> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, g_frame_interval, &ival); >> + if (!ret) >> + a->parm.capture.timeperframe = ival.interval; >> + return ret; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(v4l2_g_parm_cap); >> + >> +int v4l2_s_parm_cap(struct video_device *vdev, >> + struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_streamparm *a) >> +{ >> + struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval ival = { >> + 0, >> + a->parm.capture.timeperframe > > I'd explicitly specify which members are assigned here. It looks cleaner > and does not depend on field order in the struct definition. It won't be > changed as it's part of uAPI but then again people take examples from > existing code and could do this where it's not safe. True. I'll change this. Regards, Hans