Hi Randy,
thanks for noticing,
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:12:19PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/16/2018 01:44 PM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Hello,
> > new version of CEU after Hans' review.
> >
> > Added his Acked-by to most patches and closed review comments.
> > Running v4l2-compliance, I noticed a new failure introduced by the way I now
> > calculate the plane sizes in set/try_fmt.
>
> I would expect that you have already seen this, but I get a build error
> in renesas-ceu.c. Here is a small patch for it.
Actually I did not.
The compile error has been introduced by this commit
commit 4e48afecd5ee3a394d228349fc1c33982e9fb557
Author: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Sep 27 10:12:00 2017 -0400
media: v4l2-async: simplify v4l2_async_subdev structure
Which is not in v4.15-rc8 on which I have based my work on.
As a general question, if I'm aiming to have my driver included in
next release, should I always base my work on linux-next or it depends
on sub-system/maintainers preferences?
Thanks
j
>
> ---
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fix build error (on x86 with COMPILE_TEST):
>
> ../drivers/media/platform/renesas-ceu.c: In function 'ceu_parse_dt':
> ../drivers/media/platform/renesas-ceu.c:1497:27: error: request for member 'fwnode' in something not a structure or union
> ceu_sd->asd.match.fwnode.fwnode =
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/renesas-ceu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-next-20180119.orig/drivers/media/platform/renesas-ceu.c
> +++ linux-next-20180119/drivers/media/platform/renesas-ceu.c
> @@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ static int ceu_parse_dt(struct ceu_devic
>
> ceu_sd->mbus_flags = fw_ep.bus.parallel.flags;
> ceu_sd->asd.match_type = V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE;
> - ceu_sd->asd.match.fwnode.fwnode =
> + ceu_sd->asd.match.fwnode =
> fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent(
> of_fwnode_handle(ep));
>
>
