Hi Edgar,
A few more comments.
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 22:07:24 EET Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 October 2017 10:54:17 EET Edgar Thier wrote:
> > Use flags the device exposes for UVC controls.
> > This allows the device to define which property flags are set.
> >
> > Since some cameras offer auto-adjustments for properties (e.g. auto-gain),
> > the values of other properties (e.g. gain) can change in the camera.
> > Examining the flags ensures that the driver is aware of such properties.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar Thier <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> Running scripts/checkpatch.pl on the patch produces the following warning
> and errors.
>
> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> #83: FILE: drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c:1635:
> +static int uvc_ctrl_get_flags(struct uvc_device *dev, const struct
> uvc_control *ctrl,
>
> ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
> #140: FILE: drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c:1702:
> + ^I^Iret = flags;$
>
> WARNING: please, no space before tabs
> #140: FILE: drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c:1702:
> + ^I^Iret = flags;$
>
> WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
> #140: FILE: drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c:1702:
> + ^I^Iret = flags;$
>
> The last three should be fixed. The first one can sometimes be considered a
> matter of taste, but in this case it's easy to fix so we should address it
> too.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c index 20397aba..8f902a41 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > @@ -1629,6 +1629,40 @@ static void uvc_ctrl_fixup_xu_info(struct
> > uvc_device
> > *dev, }
> >
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Retrieve flags for a given control
> > + */
> > +static int uvc_ctrl_get_flags(struct uvc_device *dev, const struct
> > uvc_control *ctrl,
> > + const struct uvc_control_info *info)
> > +{
> > + u8 *data;
> > + int ret = 0;
>
> No need to initialize ret to 0.
>
> > + int flags = 0;
> > +
> > + data = kmalloc(2, GFP_KERNEL);
Isn't 1 byte enough ?
> > + if (data == NULL)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + ret = uvc_query_ctrl(dev, UVC_GET_INFO, ctrl->entity->id, dev->intfnum,
> > + info->selector, data, 1);
Indentation is incorrect here.
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_CONTROL,
> > + "GET_INFO failed on control %pUl/%u (%d).\n",
> > + info->entity, info->selector, ret);
And here too.
> > + } else {
> > + flags = UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_MIN | UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_MAX
> > + | UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_RES | UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_DEF
> > + | (data[0] & UVC_CONTROL_CAP_GET ?
> > + UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_CUR : 0)
> > + | (data[0] & UVC_CONTROL_CAP_SET ?
> > + UVC_CTRL_FLAG_SET_CUR : 0)
> > + | (data[0] & UVC_CONTROL_CAP_AUTOUPDATE ?
> > + UVC_CTRL_FLAG_AUTO_UPDATE : 0);
> > + }
> > + kfree(data);
> > + return flags;
>
> So in case of failure you will return 0, and the caller will ignore the
> failure. This changes the behaviour of uvc_ctrl_fill_xu_info() which I don't
> think is a good idea. For uvc_ctrl_add_info(), on the other hand, ignoring
> errors is probably good, as otherwise we could introduce regressions with
> devices that don't implement GET_INFO properly on standard controls (the
> driver currently doesn't query information for standard controls so doesn't
> catch those devices).
>
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Query control information (size and flags) for XU controls.
> > */
> > @@ -1636,6 +1670,7 @@ static int uvc_ctrl_fill_xu_info(struct uvc_device
> > *dev, const struct uvc_control *ctrl, struct uvc_control_info *info)
> > {
> > u8 *data;
> > + int flags;
> > int ret;
> >
> > data = kmalloc(2, GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -1659,24 +1694,15 @@ static int uvc_ctrl_fill_xu_info(struct uvc_device
> > *dev,
> >
> > info->size = le16_to_cpup((__le16 *)data);
> >
> > - /* Query the control information (GET_INFO) */
> > - ret = uvc_query_ctrl(dev, UVC_GET_INFO, ctrl->entity->id, dev->intfnum,
> > - info->selector, data, 1);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > + flags = uvc_ctrl_get_flags(dev, ctrl, info);
> > +
>
> No need for a blank line here.
>
> > + if (flags < 0) {
> > uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_CONTROL,
> > - "GET_INFO failed on control %pUl/%u (%d).\n",
> > - info->entity, info->selector, ret);
> > + "Failed to retrieve flags (%d).\n", ret);
> > + ret = flags;
> > goto done;
> > }
> > -
> > - info->flags = UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_MIN | UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_MAX
> > - | UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_RES | UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_DEF
> > - | (data[0] & UVC_CONTROL_CAP_GET ?
> > - UVC_CTRL_FLAG_GET_CUR : 0)
> > - | (data[0] & UVC_CONTROL_CAP_SET ?
> > - UVC_CTRL_FLAG_SET_CUR : 0)
> > - | (data[0] & UVC_CONTROL_CAP_AUTOUPDATE ?
> > - UVC_CTRL_FLAG_AUTO_UPDATE : 0);
> > + info->flags = flags;
> >
> > uvc_ctrl_fixup_xu_info(dev, ctrl, info);
> >
> > @@ -1890,6 +1916,7 @@ static int uvc_ctrl_add_info(struct uvc_device *dev,
> > struct uvc_control *ctrl, const struct uvc_control_info *info)
> > {
> > int ret = 0;
> > + int flags = 0;
>
> There's no need to initialize the flags variable to 0.
>
> > ctrl->info = *info;
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctrl->info.mappings);
> >
> > @@ -1902,6 +1929,13 @@ static int uvc_ctrl_add_info(struct uvc_device
> > *dev, struct uvc_control *ctrl,
> > goto done;
> > }
> >
> > + flags = uvc_ctrl_get_flags(dev, ctrl, info);
> > + if (flags < 0)
> > + uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_CONTROL,
> > + "Failed to retrieve flags (%d).\n", ret);
> > + else
> > + ctrl->info.flags = flags;
> > +
> > ctrl->initialized = 1;
> >
> > uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_CONTROL, "Added control %pUl/%u to device %s "
>
> All these are small issues. Let me try to address them, I'll send you an
> updated patch shortly.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
