Hi, Mauro
> > + ret = tnr_dmd->io->read_regs(tnr_dmd->io,
> > + CXD2880_IO_TGT_SYS,
> > + 0x10, data, 1);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + if ((data[0] & 0x01) == 0x00)
> > + return -EBUSY;
>
> I don't know anything about this hardware, but it sounds weird to return
> -EBUSY here, except if the hardware reached a permanent busy condition,
> and would require some sort of reset to work again.
>
> As this is in the middle of lots of things, I *suspect* that this is
> not the case.
>
> If I'm right, and this is just a transitory solution that could happen
> for a limited amount of time, e. g. if what's there at data[0] is a flag
> saying that the device didn't finish the last operation yet, maybe the
> best would be to do something like:
>
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> ret = tnr_dmd->io->read_regs(tnr_dmd->io,
> CXD2880_IO_TGT_SYS,
> 0x10, data, 1);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> if (data[0] & 0x01)
> break;
> msleep(10);
> }
> if (!(data[0] & 0x01))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> > +
> > + ret = cxd2880_io_write_multi_regs(tnr_dmd->io,
> > + CXD2880_IO_TGT_SYS,
> > + rf_init1_seq5,
> > + ARRAY_SIZE(rf_init1_seq5));
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> > +
> > + ret = tnr_dmd->io->write_reg(tnr_dmd->io,
> > + CXD2880_IO_TGT_SYS,
> > + 0x00, 0x0a);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + ret = tnr_dmd->io->read_regs(tnr_dmd->io,
> > + CXD2880_IO_TGT_SYS,
> > + 0x11, data, 1);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + if ((data[0] & 0x01) == 0x00)
> > + return -EBUSY;
>
> Same here and on similar places.
As the hardware specification, It is abnormal if certain register doesn't become 1 even if sleep time passes.
Perhaps it should not be return EBUSY.
We will reconsider error code.
Thanks,
Takiguchi
