Hi, On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 07:01:40PM +0800, Yong wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:50:47 +0100 > Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Yong, > > > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:45:11PM +0800, Yong wrote: > > > I just noticed that you are using the second iteration? > > > Have you received my third iteration? > > > > Sorry for the late reply, and for not coming back to you yet about > > that test. No, this is still in your v2. I've definitely received your > > v3, I just didn't have time to update to it yet. > > > > But don't worry, my mail was mostly to know if you had tested that > > setup on your side to try to nail down the issue on my end, not really > > a review or comment that would prevent your patch from going in. > > I mean, > The v2 exactly has a bug which may cause the CSI writing frame to > a wrong memory address. Ah, sorry I misunderstood you then. I'll definitely test your v3.. > BTW, should I send a new version. I have made some improve sine v3. .. or your v4 :) Yes, please send a new version. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
