Hi Mario,
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, grafgrimm77@xxxxxx wrote:
Am Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:37:18 +0100 (CET)
schrieb Patrick Boettcher <pboettcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Mario Bachmann wrote:
Hi there,
I tried linux-2.6.31.5 and tuning still does not work:
tuning to 738000000 Hz
video pid 0x0131, audio pid 0x0132
status 00 | signal 0000 | snr 0000 | ber 001fffff | unc 0000ffff |
status 00 | signal 0000 | snr 0000 | ber 001fffff | unc 0000ffff |
status 00 | signal 0000 | snr 0000 | ber 001fffff | unc 0000ffff |
status 04 | signal 0000 | snr 0000 | ber 001fffff | unc 0000ffff |
With some changes for the following file it works again:
/usr/src/linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dibusb-common.c
diff -Naur dibusb-common.c-ORIGINAL dibusb-common.c
--- dibusb-common.c-ORIGINAL 2009-11-07 10:30:43.705344308 +0100
+++ dibusb-common.c 2009-11-07 10:33:49.969345253 +0100
@@ -133,17 +133,14 @@
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
/* write/read request */
- if (i+1 < num && (msg[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) == 0
- && (msg[i+1].flags & I2C_M_RD)) {
+ if (i+1 < num && (msg[i+1].flags & I2C_M_RD)) {
if (dibusb_i2c_msg(d, msg[i].addr, msg[i].buf,msg[i].len,
msg[i+1].buf,msg[i+1].len) < 0)
break;
i++;
- } else if ((msg[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) == 0) {
+ } else
if (dibusb_i2c_msg(d, msg[i].addr, msg[i].buf,msg[i].len,NULL,0) < 0)
break;
- } else
- break;
}
Doing it is reverting a fix which avoids that uncontrolled i2c-access from
userspace is destroying the USB-eeprom.
I understand that this is breaking the tuning for your board. I'm just not
understanding why.
If you have some time to debug this issue, could you please try the
following:
One of the devices for your board is trying to do an I2c access which is
falling into the last 'else'-branch - can you add a printk to find out
which one it is? The access must be wrongly constructed and must be fixed
in that driver.
thanks,
PS: if you don't have time to do it, please tell so.
--
Patrick
http://www.kernellabs.com/
I do not understand exactly. printk what? Could you please give me a
complete piece of code with the printk command? Would be great!
My printk-tries ends up in an "Oops".
There is a
} else
break;
sequence in dibusb_i2c_xfer
instead of break, please add something like
printk(KERN_ERR "----- hello stupid I2C access ----\n");
recompile and load the new module, then check whether the line is
appearing in /var/log/messages or /var/log/syslog when you tune the board.
If this is the case, try to identify which device is issuing the access by
printing the i2c-address of struct i2c_msg.
HTH,
--
Patrick
http://www.kernellabs.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html