Hi Philippe, On Friday, 17 November 2017 17:08:51 EET Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:54:15 +0100 Philippe Ombredanne escreveu: > >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> > As we're now using SPDX identifiers, on several > >> > media drivers I wrote, add the proper SPDX, identifying > >> > the license I meant. > >> > > >> > As we're now using the short license, it doesn't make sense to > >> > keep the original license text. > >> > > >> > Also, fix MODULE_LICENSE to properly identify GPL v2. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Mauro, > >> Thanks ++ .... I can now get rid of a special license detection rule I > >> had added for the specific language of your notices in the > >> scancode-toolkit! > >> > > :-) > > > > Yeah, I was too lazy to copy the usual GPL preamble on those > > drivers ;-) > > I guess I built a lazyness checker with scancode to keep you check then ;) > But FWIW you are not alone there and at least your notices are/were > consistent across files ... there are still several hundred variations > of GPL notices in the kernel each with subtle or byzantine changes. > > Some of them are rather funny like Evgeniy's thermal code being under > the "therms" of the GPL [1] Isn't that very appropriate for the thermal code ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therm Sorry, couldn't resist :) > CC: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > [1] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/dri > vers/w1/slaves/w1_therm.c?h=v4.14-rc8#n8 -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
