On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 09:38:47AM +0100, Laurent Caumont wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Thank you for the changes, It's better like this, I will test it. Great, thanks. Please let us know if it works, then it can be included. > Don't you think that a much better way would be to make the kalloc > directly inside dvb_usb_generic_rw instead of changing each call of > it? Are you sure there are no other mistake somewhere else ? That would introduce an extra kmalloc and memcpy in that function, and for many call sites that would be unnecesary, so it would be inefficient. Sean
