On 22/09/17 22:08, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> Sorry Markus, just stay away from the videobuf-* sources. > > Will the software evolution be continued for related source files? > Are there any update candidates left over in the directory “v4l2-core”? Sorry, I don't understand the question. We don't want to touch the videobuf-* files unless there is a very good reason. That old videobuf framework is deprecated and the code is quite fragile (i.e. easy to break things). Everything else in that directory is under continuous development. It's core code though, so it gets a much more in-depth code review than patches for e.g. a driver. Regards, Hans
