On 22 September 2017 at 12:00, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 13/09/17 17:49, Dave Stevenson wrote:
>> OV5647
>>
>> v4l2-compliance SHA : f6ecbc90656815d91dc6ba90aac0ad8193a14b38
>>
>> Driver Info:
>> Driver name : unicam
>> Card type : unicam
>> Bus info : platform:unicam 3f801000.csi1
>> Driver version: 4.13.0
>> Capabilities : 0x85200001
>> Video Capture
>> Read/Write
>> Streaming
>> Extended Pix Format
>> Device Capabilities
>> Device Caps : 0x05200001
>> Video Capture
>> Read/Write
>> Streaming
>> Extended Pix Format
>>
>> Compliance test for device /dev/video0 (not using libv4l2):
>>
>> Required ioctls:
>> test VIDIOC_QUERYCAP: OK
>>
>> Allow for multiple opens:
>> test second video open: OK
>> test VIDIOC_QUERYCAP: OK
>> test VIDIOC_G/S_PRIORITY: OK
>> test for unlimited opens: OK
>>
>> Debug ioctls:
>> test VIDIOC_DBG_G/S_REGISTER: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_LOG_STATUS: OK
>>
>> Input ioctls:
>> test VIDIOC_G/S_TUNER/ENUM_FREQ_BANDS: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_G/S_FREQUENCY: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_S_HW_FREQ_SEEK: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_ENUMAUDIO: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_G/S/ENUMINPUT: OK
>> test VIDIOC_G/S_AUDIO: OK (Not Supported)
>> Inputs: 1 Audio Inputs: 0 Tuners: 0
>>
>> Output ioctls:
>> test VIDIOC_G/S_MODULATOR: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_G/S_FREQUENCY: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_ENUMAUDOUT: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_G/S/ENUMOUTPUT: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_G/S_AUDOUT: OK (Not Supported)
>> Outputs: 0 Audio Outputs: 0 Modulators: 0
>>
>> Input/Output configuration ioctls:
>> test VIDIOC_ENUM/G/S/QUERY_STD: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_ENUM/G/S/QUERY_DV_TIMINGS: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_DV_TIMINGS_CAP: OK (Not Supported)
>> test VIDIOC_G/S_EDID: OK (Not Supported)
>>
>> Test input 0:
>>
>> Control ioctls:
>> test VIDIOC_QUERY_EXT_CTRL/QUERYMENU: OK
>> test VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL: OK
>> test VIDIOC_G/S_CTRL: OK
>> fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(587): g_ext_ctrls does not
>> support count == 0
>
> Huh. The issue here is that there are no controls at all, but the
> control API is present. The class_check() function in v4l2-ctrls.c expects
> that there are controls and if not it returns -EINVAL, causing this test
> to fail.
>
> Try to apply this patch:
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> index dd1db678718c..4e53a8654690 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> @@ -2818,7 +2818,7 @@ static int prepare_ext_ctrls(struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *hdl,
> static int class_check(struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *hdl, u32 which)
> {
> if (which == 0 || which == V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_DEF_VAL)
> - return list_empty(&hdl->ctrl_refs) ? -EINVAL : 0;
> + return 0;
> return find_ref_lock(hdl, which | 1) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> }
>
>
> and see if it will pass the compliance test. There may be other issues.
> I think that the compliance test should handle the case where there are no
> controls, so this is a good test.
Fails.
fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(589): g_ext_ctrls worked even
when no controls are present
test VIDIOC_G/S/TRY_EXT_CTRLS: FAIL
> That said, another solution is that the driver detects that there are no
> controls in unicam_probe_complete() and sets unicam->v4l2_dev.ctrl_handler
> to NULL.
>
> I think you should do this in v4. Having control ioctls but no actual controls
> is not wrong as such, but it is a bit misleading towards the application.
OK, will do.
Dave
