Re: [PATCH v1.2 1/1] omap3isp: Skip CSI-2 receiver initialisation in CCP2 configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Laurent,

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:32:00PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Friday 11 Aug 2017 12:57:09 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > If the CSI-2 receiver isn't part of the pipeline (or isn't there to begin
> > with), skip its initialisation.
> 
> I don't think the commit message really describes the patch.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # on
> > Beagleboard-xM + MPT9P031 Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > since v1.1:
> > 
> > - Assign phy->entity before calling omap3isp_csiphy_config(), for
> >   phy->entity is used by omap3isp_csiphy_config(). (Thanks to Pavel for
> >   spotting this.)
> > 
> >  drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispccp2.c   |  2 +-
> >  drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsi2.c   |  4 +--
> >  drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.c | 38 ++++++++++++--------------
> >  drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.h |  6 +++--
> >  4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispccp2.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispccp2.c index
> > 47210b102bcb..3db8df09cd9a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispccp2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispccp2.c
> > @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ static int ccp2_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int
> > enable) switch (enable) {
> >  	case ISP_PIPELINE_STREAM_CONTINUOUS:
> >  		if (ccp2->phy) {
> > -			ret = omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(ccp2->phy);
> > +			ret = omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(ccp2->phy, &sd->entity);
> >  			if (ret < 0)
> >  				return ret;
> >  		}
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsi2.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsi2.c index
> > 7dae2fe0d42d..3ec37fed710b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsi2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsi2.c
> > @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ int omap3isp_csi2_reset(struct isp_csi2_device *csi2)
> >  	if (!csi2->available)
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> > 
> > -	if (csi2->phy->phy_in_use)
> > +	if (csi2->phy->entity)
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> > 
> >  	isp_reg_set(isp, csi2->regs1, ISPCSI2_SYSCONFIG,
> > @@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ static int csi2_set_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int
> > enable)
> > 
> >  	switch (enable) {
> >  	case ISP_PIPELINE_STREAM_CONTINUOUS:
> > -		if (omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(csi2->phy) < 0)
> > +		if (omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(csi2->phy, &sd->entity) < 0)
> >  			return -ENODEV;
> >  		if (csi2->output & CSI2_OUTPUT_MEMORY)
> >  			omap3isp_sbl_enable(isp, OMAP3_ISP_SBL_CSI2A_WRITE);
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.c index
> > 2028bb519108..aedd88fa8246 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.c
> > @@ -164,15 +164,18 @@ static int csiphy_set_power(struct isp_csiphy *phy,
> > u32 power)
> > 
> >  static int omap3isp_csiphy_config(struct isp_csiphy *phy)
> >  {
> > -	struct isp_csi2_device *csi2 = phy->csi2;
> > -	struct isp_pipeline *pipe = to_isp_pipeline(&csi2->subdev.entity);
> > -	struct isp_bus_cfg *buscfg = pipe->external->host_priv;
> > +	struct isp_pipeline *pipe = to_isp_pipeline(phy->entity);
> > +	struct isp_bus_cfg *buscfg;
> >  	struct isp_csiphy_lanes_cfg *lanes;
> >  	int csi2_ddrclk_khz;
> >  	unsigned int num_data_lanes, used_lanes = 0;
> >  	unsigned int i;
> >  	u32 reg;
> > 
> > +	if (!pipe)
> > +		return -EBUSY;
> 
> When can this happen ?

It shouldn't. Just in case, it'd be a driver bug if it did. What would you
think of adding WARN_ON() here?

> 
> > +	buscfg = pipe->external->host_priv;
> >  	if (!buscfg) {
> >  		struct isp_async_subdev *isd =
> >  			container_of(pipe->external->asd,
> > @@ -222,7 +225,7 @@ static int omap3isp_csiphy_config(struct isp_csiphy
> > *phy) csi2_ddrclk_khz = pipe->external_rate / 1000
> >  		/ (2 * hweight32(used_lanes)) * pipe->external_width;
> > 
> > -	reg = isp_reg_readl(csi2->isp, phy->phy_regs, ISPCSIPHY_REG0);
> > +	reg = isp_reg_readl(phy->isp, phy->phy_regs, ISPCSIPHY_REG0);
> > 
> >  	reg &= ~(ISPCSIPHY_REG0_THS_TERM_MASK |
> >  		 ISPCSIPHY_REG0_THS_SETTLE_MASK);
> > @@ -233,9 +236,9 @@ static int omap3isp_csiphy_config(struct isp_csiphy
> > *phy) reg |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(90 * csi2_ddrclk_khz, 1000000) + 3)
> >  		<< ISPCSIPHY_REG0_THS_SETTLE_SHIFT;
> > 
> > -	isp_reg_writel(csi2->isp, reg, phy->phy_regs, ISPCSIPHY_REG0);
> > +	isp_reg_writel(phy->isp, reg, phy->phy_regs, ISPCSIPHY_REG0);
> > 
> > -	reg = isp_reg_readl(csi2->isp, phy->phy_regs, ISPCSIPHY_REG1);
> > +	reg = isp_reg_readl(phy->isp, phy->phy_regs, ISPCSIPHY_REG1);
> > 
> >  	reg &= ~(ISPCSIPHY_REG1_TCLK_TERM_MASK |
> >  		 ISPCSIPHY_REG1_TCLK_MISS_MASK |
> > @@ -244,10 +247,10 @@ static int omap3isp_csiphy_config(struct isp_csiphy
> > *phy) reg |= TCLK_MISS << ISPCSIPHY_REG1_TCLK_MISS_SHIFT;
> >  	reg |= TCLK_SETTLE << ISPCSIPHY_REG1_TCLK_SETTLE_SHIFT;
> > 
> > -	isp_reg_writel(csi2->isp, reg, phy->phy_regs, ISPCSIPHY_REG1);
> > +	isp_reg_writel(phy->isp, reg, phy->phy_regs, ISPCSIPHY_REG1);
> > 
> >  	/* DPHY lane configuration */
> > -	reg = isp_reg_readl(csi2->isp, phy->cfg_regs, ISPCSI2_PHY_CFG);
> > +	reg = isp_reg_readl(phy->isp, phy->cfg_regs, ISPCSI2_PHY_CFG);
> > 
> >  	for (i = 0; i < num_data_lanes; i++) {
> >  		reg &= ~(ISPCSI2_PHY_CFG_DATA_POL_MASK(i + 1) |
> > @@ -263,12 +266,12 @@ static int omap3isp_csiphy_config(struct isp_csiphy
> > *phy) reg |= lanes->clk.pol << ISPCSI2_PHY_CFG_CLOCK_POL_SHIFT;
> >  	reg |= lanes->clk.pos << ISPCSI2_PHY_CFG_CLOCK_POSITION_SHIFT;
> > 
> > -	isp_reg_writel(csi2->isp, reg, phy->cfg_regs, ISPCSI2_PHY_CFG);
> > +	isp_reg_writel(phy->isp, reg, phy->cfg_regs, ISPCSI2_PHY_CFG);
> > 
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> > -int omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(struct isp_csiphy *phy)
> > +int omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(struct isp_csiphy *phy, struct media_entity
> > *entity) {
> >  	int rval;
> > 
> > @@ -288,6 +291,8 @@ int omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(struct isp_csiphy *phy)
> >  	if (rval < 0)
> >  		goto done;
> > 
> > +	phy->entity = entity;
> > +
> >  	rval = omap3isp_csiphy_config(phy);
> >  	if (rval < 0)
> >  		goto done;
> > @@ -301,10 +306,9 @@ int omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(struct isp_csiphy *phy)
> > 
> >  		csiphy_power_autoswitch_enable(phy, true);
> >  	}
> > -
> > -	phy->phy_in_use = 1;
> > -
> >  done:
> > +	phy->entity = NULL;
> > +
> 
> Did you really mean to release the PHY here ?

Yes, indeed. Fixed.

> 
> >  	mutex_unlock(&phy->mutex);
> >  	return rval;
> >  }
> > @@ -312,10 +316,8 @@ int omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(struct isp_csiphy *phy)
> >  void omap3isp_csiphy_release(struct isp_csiphy *phy)
> >  {
> >  	mutex_lock(&phy->mutex);
> > -	if (phy->phy_in_use) {
> > -		struct isp_csi2_device *csi2 = phy->csi2;
> > -		struct isp_pipeline *pipe =
> > -			to_isp_pipeline(&csi2->subdev.entity);
> > +	if (phy->entity && phy->entity->pipe) {
> > +		struct isp_pipeline *pipe = to_isp_pipeline(phy->entity);
> >  		struct isp_bus_cfg *buscfg = pipe->external->host_priv;
> > 
> >  		csiphy_routing_cfg(phy, buscfg->interface, false,
> > @@ -325,7 +327,7 @@ void omap3isp_csiphy_release(struct isp_csiphy *phy)
> >  			csiphy_set_power(phy, ISPCSI2_PHY_CFG_PWR_CMD_OFF);
> >  		}
> >  		regulator_disable(phy->vdd);
> > -		phy->phy_in_use = 0;
> > +		phy->entity = NULL;
> >  	}
> >  	mutex_unlock(&phy->mutex);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.h
> > b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.h index
> > 978ca5c80a6c..cffda0265767 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.h
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.h
> > @@ -25,9 +25,10 @@ struct regulator;
> >  struct isp_csiphy {
> >  	struct isp_device *isp;
> >  	struct mutex mutex;	/* serialize csiphy configuration */
> > -	u8 phy_in_use;
> >  	struct isp_csi2_device *csi2;
> >  	struct regulator *vdd;
> > +	/* the entity for which the phy was acquired for */
> 
> Either "the entity that the phy was acquired for", or "the entity for which 
> the phy was acquired". Or you could rename the field to owner and document it 
> as "the entity owning the PHY", I think that would be more explicit in the 
> code.

Yes, there's one "for" too much. I'll drop the latter.

> 
> > +	struct media_entity *entity;
> > 
> >  	/* mem resources - enums as defined in enum isp_mem_resources */
> >  	unsigned int cfg_regs;
> > @@ -36,7 +37,8 @@ struct isp_csiphy {
> >  	u8 num_data_lanes;	/* number of CSI2 Data Lanes supported */
> >  };
> > 
> > -int omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(struct isp_csiphy *phy);
> > +int omap3isp_csiphy_acquire(struct isp_csiphy *phy,
> > +			    struct media_entity *entity);
> >  void omap3isp_csiphy_release(struct isp_csiphy *phy);
> >  int omap3isp_csiphy_init(struct isp_device *isp);
> >  void omap3isp_csiphy_cleanup(struct isp_device *isp);
> 

-- 
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux