Em Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:43:03 +0200 Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On 2017-08-09 16:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:38:52 +0200 > > Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > >> This prevents potentially scary debug messages from the i2c core. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c | 3 +++ > >> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c | 3 ++- > >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c > >> index 46646ecd2dbc..f372ad3917a8 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c > >> @@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ int cx231xx_dev_init(struct cx231xx *dev) > >> dev->i2c_bus[0].i2c_period = I2C_SPEED_100K; /* 100 KHz */ > >> dev->i2c_bus[0].i2c_nostop = 0; > >> dev->i2c_bus[0].i2c_reserve = 0; > >> + dev->i2c_bus[0].i2c_rc = -ENODEV; > >> > >> /* External Master 2 Bus */ > >> dev->i2c_bus[1].nr = 1; > >> @@ -1318,6 +1319,7 @@ int cx231xx_dev_init(struct cx231xx *dev) > >> dev->i2c_bus[1].i2c_period = I2C_SPEED_100K; /* 100 KHz */ > >> dev->i2c_bus[1].i2c_nostop = 0; > >> dev->i2c_bus[1].i2c_reserve = 0; > >> + dev->i2c_bus[1].i2c_rc = -ENODEV; > >> > >> /* Internal Master 3 Bus */ > >> dev->i2c_bus[2].nr = 2; > >> @@ -1325,6 +1327,7 @@ int cx231xx_dev_init(struct cx231xx *dev) > >> dev->i2c_bus[2].i2c_period = I2C_SPEED_100K; /* 100kHz */ > >> dev->i2c_bus[2].i2c_nostop = 0; > >> dev->i2c_bus[2].i2c_reserve = 0; > >> + dev->i2c_bus[2].i2c_rc = -ENODEV; > >> > >> /* register I2C buses */ > >> errCode = cx231xx_i2c_register(&dev->i2c_bus[0]); > >> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c > >> index 3e49517cb5e0..8ce6b815d16d 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c > >> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c > >> @@ -553,7 +553,8 @@ int cx231xx_i2c_register(struct cx231xx_i2c *bus) > >> */ > >> void cx231xx_i2c_unregister(struct cx231xx_i2c *bus) > >> { > >> - i2c_del_adapter(&bus->i2c_adap); > >> + if (!bus->i2c_rc) > >> + i2c_del_adapter(&bus->i2c_adap); > > > > That doesn't sound right. what happens if i2c_rc is 1 or 2? > > > > IMHO, the right would would be, instead: > > > > if (bus->i2c_rc >= 0) > > i2c_del_adapter(&bus->i2c_adap); > > In theory, yes. But in practice i2c_add_adapter never returns >0, and is > also documented so. Good point. Just applied the patch. > > Let me know if you still want an update. In that case I'll also fix the > precedent present in the context of patch 1/3, i.e. > > if (0 != bus->i2c_rc) > ... > > Cheers, > peda Thanks, Mauro