Em Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:30:13 +0200 Daniel Scheller <d.scheller.oss@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Am Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:11:27 +0200 > schrieb Ralph Metzler <rjkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Daniel Scheller writes: > > > > > > IIRC this was -main.c, and basically the code split, but no > > > specific file. However, each of the additionals (hw, io, irq) were > > > done with a reason (please also see their commit messages at > > > patches 4-6): > > > [...] > > > > As I wrote before, changes like this will break other things like the > > OctopusNet build tree. So, I cannot use them like this or without > > changes at other places. And even if I wanted to, I cannot pull > > anything into the public dddvb repository. > > Ok, you probably have seen the PRs I created against dddvb, as they > apply basically the same as is contained in this patchset, and even > fixes a few minors. Thus, lets not declare this as merge-blocker for > this patches, please. I would prefer if we could spend more time trying to find a way where we can proceed without increasing the discrepancies between upstream and DD tree, but, instead to reduce. I mean, if we know that some change won't be accepted at DD tree, better to change our approach to another one that it is acceptable on both upstream and DD trees. Thanks, Mauro
