> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Devin Heitmueller > <dheitmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Barry Williams <bazzawill@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> Hi Devin >>> I tried your tree and I seem to get the same problem on one box I get >>> the flood of 'dvb-usb: bulk message failed: -110 (1/0'. >> <snip> >> >> Can you please confirm the USB ID of the board you are having the >> problem with (by running "lsusb" from a terminal window)? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Devin >> -- > > > On the first box I have > Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0fe9:db98 DVICO > Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0fe9:db98 DVICO > > on the second > Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0fe9:db78 DVICO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 > (ZL10353+xc2028/xc3028) (initialized) > Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0fe9:db78 DVICO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 > (ZL10353+xc2028/xc3028) (initialized) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Barry, I have the Dual Digital 4 rev1 card which corresponds to the 0fe9:db78 card. 0fe9:db98 is the Dual Digital 4 rev2 card which I believe uses completely different hardware and it's behavior is unchanged by my patch which only targets the rev1 card. I suspect the problems you are still reporting are from the different cards, completely unrelated to my fix. Would you be able to retest after removing the rev2 cards from the machine? -Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
