gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool
is confusing:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
In this instance, I think using multiplication is more intuitive
than '&&', so I'm adding a comparison to zero instead to shut up
the warning. To further improve readability, I also make the
error case indented and leave the normal case as the final 'return'
statement.
Fixes: 7632b30e4b8b ("drm/nouveau/clk: namespace + nvidia gpu names (no binary change)")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c
index 96e0941c8edd..04b4f4ccf186 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c
@@ -130,10 +130,10 @@ read_pll(struct gt215_clk *clk, int idx, u32 pll)
sclk = read_clk(clk, 0x10 + idx, false);
}
- if (M * P)
- return sclk * N / (M * P);
+ if (M * P == 0)
+ return 0;
- return 0;
+ return sclk * N / (M * P);
}
static int
--
2.9.0
