On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:25:33PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi Hugues, > > > Am 22.06.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@xxxxxx>: > > > > From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This adds documentation of device tree bindings > > for the OV965X family camera sensor module. > > > > Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@xxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov965x.txt | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov965x.txt [...] > > +Optional Properties: > > +- resetb-gpios: reference to the GPIO connected to the resetb pin, if any. > > +- pwdn-gpios: reference to the GPIO connected to the pwdn pin, if any. > > Here I wonder why you did split that up into two gpios. Each "*-gpios" can have > multiple entries and if one is not used, a 0 can be specified to make it being ignored. > > But it is up to DT maintainers what they prefer: separate single gpios or a single gpio array. I think that is pretty clear if you survey a number of bindings (hint: it's the former). Rob
