Hi Sylwester, Here is another patch in case you decide that it is better to apply this one. Thanks -- Gustavo A. R. Silva ========== Fix the position of the arguments in function call. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1248800 Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1269141 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c index 1b30be72..25c7a7d 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int s3c_camif_hw_init(struct camif_dev *camif, struct camif_vp *vp) camif_hw_set_test_pattern(camif, camif->test_pattern); if (variant->has_img_effect) camif_hw_set_effect(camif, camif->colorfx, - camif->colorfx_cb, camif->colorfx_cr); + camif->colorfx_cr, camif->colorfx_cb); if (variant->ip_revision == S3C6410_CAMIF_IP_REV) camif_hw_set_input_path(vp); camif_cfg_video_path(vp); @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ irqreturn_t s3c_camif_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv) camif_hw_set_test_pattern(camif, camif->test_pattern); if (camif->variant->has_img_effect) camif_hw_set_effect(camif, camif->colorfx, - camif->colorfx_cb, camif->colorfx_cr); + camif->colorfx_cr, camif->colorfx_cb); vp->state &= ~ST_VP_CONFIG; } unlock: -- 2.5.0
