On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 15:46 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On 05/25/2017 02:29 AM, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > > In version 7: > > > > - video-mux: switched to Philipp's latest video-mux driver and updated > > bindings docs, that makes use of the mmio-mux framework. > > > > - mmio-mux: includes Philipp's temporary patch that adds mmio-mux support > > to video-mux driver, until mux framework is merged. > > > > - mmio-mux: updates to device tree from Philipp that define the i.MX6 mux > > devices and modifies the video-mux device to become a consumer of the > > video mmio-mux. > > > > - minor updates to Documentation/media/v4l-drivers/imx.rst. > > > > - ov5640: do nothing if entity stream count is greater than 1 in > > ov5640_s_stream(). > > > > - Previous versions of this driver had not tested the ability to enable > > multiple independent streams, for instance enabling multiple output > > pads from the imx6-mipi-csi2 subdevice, or enabling both prpenc and > > prpvf outputs. Marek Vasut tested this support and reported issues > > with it. > > > > v4l2_pipeline_inherit_controls() used the media graph walk APIs, but > > that walks both sink and source pads, so if there are multiple paths > > enabled to video capture devices, controls would be added to the wrong > > video capture device, and no controls added to the other enabled > > capture devices. > > > > These issues have been fixed. Control inheritance works correctly now > > even with multiple enabled capture paths, and (for example) > > simultaneous capture from prpenc and prpvf works also, and each with > > independent scaling, CSC, and controls. For example prpenc can be > > capturing with a 90 degree rotation, while prpvf is capturing with > > vertical flip. > > > > So the v4l2_pipeline_inherit_controls() patch has been dropped. The > > new version of control inheritance could be made generically available, > > but it would be more involved to incorporate it into v4l2-core. > > > > - A new function imx_media_fill_default_mbus_fields() is added to setup > > colorimetry at sink pads, and these are propagated to source pads. > > > > - Ensure that the current sink and source rectangles meet alignment > > restrictions before applying a new rotation control setting in > > prp-enc/vf subdevices. > > > > - Chain the s_stream() subdev calls instead of implementing a custom > > stream on/off function that attempts to call a fixed set of subdevices > > in a pipeline in the correct order. This also simplifies imx6-mipi-csi2 > > subdevice, since the correct MIPI CSI-2 startup sequence can be > > enforced completely in s_stream(), and s_power() is no longer > > required. This also paves the way for more arbitrary OF graphs > > external to the i.MX6. > > > > - Converted the v4l2_subdev and media_entity ops structures to const. > > What is the status as of v7? > > From what I can tell patch 2/34 needs an Ack from Rob Herring, patches > 4-14 are out of scope for the media subsystem, patches 20-25 and 27-34 > are all staging (so fine to be merged from my point of view). > > I'm not sure if patch 26 (defconfig) should be applied while the imx > driver is in staging. I would suggest that this patch is moved to the end > of the series. > > That leaves patches 15-19. I replied to patch 15 with a comment, patches > 16-18 look good to me, although patches 17 and 18 should be combined to one > patch since patch 17 won't compile otherwise. Is this a problem? It won't break any builds as patch 17 depends on CONFIG_MULTIPLEXER, which doesn't exist yet. I'm fine with merging the two patches, though. > Any idea when the multiplexer is expected to be merged? (just curious) I have no idea. v15 of the multiplexer framework patchset was posted on 2017-05-14, is still waiting for comments. > I would really like to get this merged for 4.13, so did I miss anything? Seconded, and not that I can tell. > From what I can tell it is really just an Ack for patch 2/34. regards Philipp
