There is no reason for all this printk spamming and certainly
not at an error log level.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c
index 6dd466558701..3cabfe54c669 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c
@@ -1191,9 +1191,8 @@ static int ov2680_detect(struct i2c_client *client)
OV2680_SC_CMMN_SUB_ID, &high);
revision = (u8) high & 0x0f;
- dev_err(&client->dev, "sensor_revision id = 0x%x\n", id);
- dev_err(&client->dev, "detect ov2680 success\n");
- dev_err(&client->dev, "################5##########\n");
+ dev_info(&client->dev, "sensor_revision id = 0x%x\n", id);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1448,8 +1447,6 @@ static int ov2680_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
void *pdata;
unsigned int i;
- printk("++++ov2680_probe++++\n");
- dev_info(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_probe++++\n");
dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dev) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "out of memory\n");
--
2.13.0
