On Saturday 31 October 2009 10:13:22 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:36:37 +0200 > > Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > On Monday 05 October 2009 15:48:17 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Upcoming I2C v4l2_subdev drivers need a way to control the subdevice > > > power state from the core. This use case is already partially covered > > > by the tuner s_standby operation, but no way to explicitly come back > > > from the standby state is available. > > > > > > Rename the tuner s_standby operation to core s_power, and fix tuner > > > drivers accordingly. The tuner core will call s_power(0) instead of > > > s_standby(). No explicit call to s_power(1) is required for tuners as > > > they are supposed to wake up from standby automatically. > > > > Mauro, Hans told me he didn't see anything wrong with this patch. As > > there's no negative feedback so far (but unfortunately no positive > > feedback either) can it be applied ? > > It seems ok to me also. Not only tuner devices need to control power, so it > seems better to have this as a core operation instead of a tuner specific > one. > > ACKED. > > I've applied it at the tree, with a small codingstyle fix. > > Hmm... mailimport script mangled the subject... I'll fix it on -git. Thanks. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
