Hi Helen and others, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:02:18PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote: > add documentation for V4L2_INPUT_TYPE_DEFAULT > > Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-enuminput.rst | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-enuminput.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-enuminput.rst > index 17aaaf9..0237e10 100644 > --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-enuminput.rst > +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-enuminput.rst > @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ at index zero, incrementing by one until the driver returns ``EINVAL``. > :stub-columns: 0 > :widths: 3 1 4 > > + * - ``V4L2_INPUT_TYPE_DEFAULT`` > + - 0 > + - This is the default value returned when no input is supported. > * - ``V4L2_INPUT_TYPE_TUNER`` > - 1 > - This input uses a tuner (RF demodulator). What would you think of calling this input as "unknown" instead of "default"? That's what an input which isn't really specified actually is. -- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
