Re: [PATCH] media: platform: Renesas IMR driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/05/2017 01:43 PM, Magnus Damm wrote:

Thanks for your efforts with this driver. Nice to see that V2 is
getting in better shape.

In the future, would it be possible for you to include the patch
version number in the [PATCH] tag somehow?

   Sorry, I'm still getting used to 'quilt mail'...

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/03/2017 02:58 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

+  - "renesas,imr-lx4-v3m" for R-Car V3M.



"renesas,-EPROBE_DEFER-imr-lx4"



   Huh? :-)


Do you know the part number of V3M?


   No, but using the names from the manual I don't need it.

NAK, like Geert says, please follow the same style as other upstream
drivers. DT compat strings is not a place for random polices.

Note that I don't think we need the SoC specific strings (like was done with the VSP1/2 driver). I'm not seeing any differences between the gen3 SoCs looking at the most current manual...

Thanks,

/ magnus

MBR, Sergei




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux