It is standard, standard for North America at least ... Anyway, it's just a name...personally I have no preference what ya name it, as long as it works and people here no longer have to jump through hoops getting their hardware to function properly in linux. I'll send a modified patch tomorrow. Thanks again for the support Mauro, Bill On 03/04/2017 09:43 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 4 Mar 2017 20:09:31 -0500 Bill Murphy <gc2majortom@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:Signed-off-by: Bill Murphy <gc2majortom@xxxxxxxxx> --- lib/libdvbv5/dvb-sat.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/libdvbv5/dvb-sat.c b/lib/libdvbv5/dvb-sat.c index 59cb7a6..acac73a 100644 --- a/lib/libdvbv5/dvb-sat.c +++ b/lib/libdvbv5/dvb-sat.c @@ -113,6 +113,19 @@ static const struct dvb_sat_lnb_priv lnb[] = { }, }, { .desc = { + .name = N_("Standard, North America"), + .alias = "NA STANDARD", + // Legacy fields - kept just to avoid API/ABI breakages + .lowfreq = , + .freqrange = { + { 11700, 12200 } + }, + }, + .freqrange = { + { 11700, 12200, 10750, 0 } + }, + }, { + .desc = { .name = N_("L10700"), .alias = "L10700", // Legacy fields - kept just to avoid API/ABI breakagesThe patch it self looks good. The only thing that I'm not comfortable is the name of the LNBf, as "STANDARD" means that it was standardized by some telecommunications organism. A quick google seek for "lnbf ku band united states" pointed to this site: http://www.galaxy-marketing.com/ku_band_lnbf.htm With describes different models for K-band satellites within North America and United States. I might be wrong, but it doesn't seem that someone standardized it. Instead, it seems to be a de-facto standard made by the hardware industry, and that not every single LNBf used there follows it, as some of them use different LO frequencies. Anyway, if this was standardized by some organism, the better would be to name it after such organism, e. g. supposing that this was standardized by ATSC as "type 1", it could be called as "ATSC type 1". Otherwise, would be better to name it with something like "North America LO10750", in order to reduce possible future conflicts as we need to add more LNBf for US there. Thanks, Mauro
