Em Sat, 4 Mar 2017 08:21:51 -0500 bill murphy <gc2majortom@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > yes I can appreciate that, but why not just make one file for each > country that actually differs, > > rather than make the rest of us suffer? > > canada and the us are the same. > > atsc/us-ATSC-center-frequencies-8VSB > > So could add two files for mexico and korea. > > atsc/mx-ATSC-center-frequencies-8VSB > atsc/kr-ATSC-center-frequencies-8VSB > > can't be any worse that the hundreds of files being maintained for DVB-T > in various countries. That could be done, but newer updates to dtv-scan-tables (and projects that use it, like Kaffeine) would have regressions for people outside US that use it. What could be done, instead, would be to have another file for US new frequency set. > > > On 03/01/2017 05:00 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > > Em Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:46:09 -0500 > > bill murphy <gc2majortom@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > >> Hi Mauro, > >> > >> Thanks for looking in to it. All is well now. > > Good! Thanks for testing. > > > >> On a sidenote, given 700 MHz is used for LTE, and not broadcasting > >> > >> anymore, would you folks consider removing ch 52 thru 69 > >> > >> in the us-atsc-frequencies if I posted a simple patch to dtv-scan-tables? > > The problem is that, despite its name, this table is used on other > > Countries using atsc (like Mexico, Canada and South Korea): > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_digital_television_deployments_by_country#/media/File:Digital_broadcast_standards.svg > > > > So, while the 700 MHz are still used on other ATSC Countries, we can't > > remove, as otherwise, it will not discover the channels at the upper > > frequency range there. > > > > Regards, > > Mauro > Thanks, Mauro
