Hi Rob,
On Wednesday 15 Feb 2017 16:08:22 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:41:16PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > This makes the example more or less correspond with the da850-evm
> > hardware setup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt | 35 +++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Spoke too soon...
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt index
> > 9c7510b..543f6f3 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
> > @@ -28,19 +28,27 @@ I2C-connected TVP5147 decoder:
> > reg = <0x217000 0x1000>;
> > interrupts = <92>;
> >
> > - port {
> > - vpif_ch0: endpoint@0 {
> > + port@0 {
> > + vpif_input_ch0: endpoint@0 {
> > reg = <0>;
> > bus-width = <8>;
> > - remote-endpoint = <&composite>;
> > + remote-endpoint = <&composite_in>;
> > };
> >
> > - vpif_ch1: endpoint@1 {
> > + vpif_input_ch1: endpoint@1 {
> > reg = <1>;
> > bus-width = <8>;
> > data-shift = <8>;
> > };
> > };
> > +
> > + port@1 {
>
> The binding doc says nothing about supporting a 2nd port.
>
> > + vpif_output_ch0: endpoint@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
>
> Don't need reg here.
And the node should then be named endpoint, not endpoint@0.
> > + bus-width = <8>;
> > + remote-endpoint = <&composite_out>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > };
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
