RE: [PATCH 5/6] Davinci VPFE Capture: Add support for Control ioctls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Murali Karicheri
Software Design Engineer
Texas Instruments Inc.
Germantown, MD 20874
phone: 301-407-9583
email: m-karicheri2@xxxxxx

>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-media-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-media-
>owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hiremath, Vaibhav
>Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:28 AM
>To: Hiremath, Vaibhav; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/6] Davinci VPFE Capture: Add support for Control
>ioctls
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiremath, Vaibhav
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:40 PM
>> To: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav
>> Subject: [PATCH 5/6] Davinci VPFE Capture: Add support for Control
>> ioctls
>>
>> From: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx>
>>
>> Added support for Control IOCTL,
>> 	- s_ctrl
>> 	- g_ctrl
>> 	- queryctrl
>>
>[Hiremath, Vaibhav] I am in the process of cleaning up of support for
>AM3517 Capture driver, which is almost same as DM6446 CCDC. Then I would
>want to finish up with OMAP3 Display driver part before moving to Media
>Controller support for MEM-to-MEM (like, Resizer).
>
>Just FYI, I will be going for vacation for 1 & 1/2 week starting from
>coming Friday. But I will make sure that I will submit patches for Display
>(OMAP3 & AM3517) and AM3517 Capture driver before that.
>
>Thanks,
>Vaibhav
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c |   43
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c
>> b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c
>> index abe21e4..f77d99b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c
>> @@ -1368,6 +1368,46 @@ static int vpfe_g_std(struct file *file, void
>> *priv, v4l2_std_id *std_id)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +static int vpfe_queryctrl(struct file *file, void *priv,
>> +		struct v4l2_queryctrl *qctrl)
>> +{
>> +	struct vpfe_device *vpfe_dev = video_drvdata(file);
>> +	struct vpfe_subdev_info *sdinfo;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	sdinfo = vpfe_dev->current_subdev;
>> +
>> +	ret = v4l2_device_call_until_err(&vpfe_dev->v4l2_dev, sdinfo-
>> >grp_id,
>> +					 core, queryctrl, qctrl);
>> +
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		qctrl->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_DISABLED;
What is this for ? Why don't we return error to user instead. I see there is a function v4l2_ctrl_check() in the v4l2 core which translates this to -EINVAL. So better to return an -EINVAL to user instead IMO. I am ok with rest of the changes.
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vpfe_g_ctrl(struct file *file, void *priv, struct
>> v4l2_control *ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	struct vpfe_device *vpfe_dev = video_drvdata(file);
>> +	struct vpfe_subdev_info *sdinfo;
>> +
>> +	sdinfo = vpfe_dev->current_subdev;
>> +
>> +	return v4l2_device_call_until_err(&vpfe_dev->v4l2_dev, sdinfo-
>> >grp_id,
>> +					 core, g_ctrl, ctrl);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vpfe_s_ctrl(struct file *file, void *priv, struct
>> v4l2_control *ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	struct vpfe_device *vpfe_dev = video_drvdata(file);
>> +	struct vpfe_subdev_info *sdinfo;
>> +
>> +	sdinfo = vpfe_dev->current_subdev;
>> +
>> +	return v4l2_device_call_until_err(&vpfe_dev->v4l2_dev, sdinfo-
>> >grp_id,
>> +					 core, s_ctrl, ctrl);
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   *  Videobuf operations
>>   */
>> @@ -1939,6 +1979,9 @@ static const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops
>> vpfe_ioctl_ops = {
>>  	.vidioc_querystd	 = vpfe_querystd,
>>  	.vidioc_s_std		 = vpfe_s_std,
>>  	.vidioc_g_std		 = vpfe_g_std,
>> +	.vidioc_queryctrl	 = vpfe_queryctrl,
>> +	.vidioc_g_ctrl		 = vpfe_g_ctrl,
>> +	.vidioc_s_ctrl		 = vpfe_s_ctrl,
>>  	.vidioc_reqbufs		 = vpfe_reqbufs,
>>  	.vidioc_querybuf	 = vpfe_querybuf,
>>  	.vidioc_qbuf		 = vpfe_qbuf,
>> --
>> 1.6.2.4
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux