On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:20:48PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Paul Mundt wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:21:30PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > This seems to depend on the RJ54N1CB0C driver, so I'll queue this up > > after that has been merged in the v4l tree. If it's available on a topic > > branch upstream that isn't going to be rebased, then I can pull that in, > > but this is not so critical either way. > > It actually shouldn't depend on the driver patch. The driver has no > headers, so... I haven't verified, but it should work either way. OTOH, > waiting for the driver patch is certainly a safe bet:-) > I thought it had a header dependency, but I must have been imagining things. So in that regard it looks fine, I'll split out my 2.6.32 stuff in to a separate branch momentarily and then roll this in when I start taking 2.6.33 stuff. This should at least allow us to start testing in -next when the driver is merged. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html