Hello, On Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:03 PM Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > >How the hardware is actually designed? I see two possibilities: > > > >1. > >[input buffer] --[dma engine]----> [resizer1] --[dma]-> [mem output > >buffer1] > > \-> [resizer2] --[dma]-> [mem output > >buffer2] > > > This is the case. > >2. > >[input buffer] ---[dma engine1]-> [resizer1] --[dma]-> [mem output buffer1] > > \-[dma engine2]-> [resizer2] --[dma]-> [mem output buffer2] > > > >In the first case we would really have problems mapping it properly to > >video > >nodes. But we should think if there are any use cases of such design? (in > >terms of mem-2-mem device) > > Why not? In a typical camera scenario, application can feed one frame and get two output frames (one > for storing and another for sending over email (a lower resolution). I just gave an example. You gave an example of the Y-type pipeline which start in real streaming device (camera) which is completely different thing. Y-type CAPTURE pipeline is quite common thing, which can be simply mapped to 2 different capture video nodes. In my previous mail I asked about Y-type pipeline which starts in memory. I don't think there is any common use case for such thing. > I know that this Y-type design makes sense as a > >part of the pipeline from a sensor or decoder device. But I cannot find any > >useful use case for mem2mem version of it. > > > >The second case is much more trivial. One can just create two separate > >resizer > >devices (with their own nodes) or one resizer driver with two hardware > >resizers underneath it. In both cases application would simply queue the > >input > >buffer 2 times for both transactions. > I am assuming we are using the One node implementation model suggested by Ivan. > > At hardware, streaming should happen at the same time (only one bit in register). So if we have second > node for the same, then driver needs to match the IO instance of second device with the corresponding > request on first node and this takes us to the same complication as with 2 video nodes implementation. Right. > Since only one capture queue per IO instance is possible in this model (matched by buf type), I don't > think we can scale it for 2 outputs case. Or is it possible to queue 2 output buffers of two different > sizes to the same queue? This can be hacked by introducing yet another 'type' (for example SECOND_CAPTURE), but I don't like such solution. Anyway - would we really need Y-type mem2mem device? Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung Poland R&D Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
