Re: [bug report] [media] vcodec: mediatek: Add Mediatek V4L2 Video Decoder Driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/09/16 14:28, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Hello Tiffany Lin,

The patch 590577a4e525: "[media] vcodec: mediatek: Add Mediatek V4L2
Video Decoder Driver" from Sep 2, 2016, leads to the following static
checker warning:

	drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec.c:536 vidioc_vdec_qbuf()
	error: buffer overflow 'vq->bufs' 32 <= u32max

drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec.c
   520  static int vidioc_vdec_qbuf(struct file *file, void *priv,
   521                              struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
   522  {
   523          struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx = fh_to_ctx(priv);
   524          struct vb2_queue *vq;
   525          struct vb2_buffer *vb;
   526          struct mtk_video_dec_buf *mtkbuf;
   527          struct vb2_v4l2_buffer  *vb2_v4l2;
   528
   529          if (ctx->state == MTK_STATE_ABORT) {
   530                  mtk_v4l2_err("[%d] Call on QBUF after unrecoverable error",
   531                                  ctx->id);
   532                  return -EIO;
   533          }
   534
   535          vq = v4l2_m2m_get_vq(ctx->m2m_ctx, buf->type);
   536          vb = vq->bufs[buf->index];

Smatch thinks that "buf->index" comes straight from the user without
being checked and that this is a buffer overflow.  It seems simple
enough to analyse the call tree.

__video_do_ioctl()
->  v4l_qbuf()
  -> vidioc_vdec_qbuf()

It seems like Smatch is correct.  I looked at a different implementation
of this and that one wasn't checked either so maybe there is something
I am not seeing.

This has obvious security implications.  Can someone take a look at
this?

This is indeed wrong.

The v4l2_m2m_qbuf() call at the end of this function calls in turn vb2_qbuf which will check the index. But if you override vidioc_qbuf (or vidioc_prepare), then
you need to check the index value.

I double-checked all cases where vidioc_qbuf was set to a driver-specific function and this is the only driver that doesn't check the index field. In all other cases it is either checked, or it is not used before calling into the vb1/vb2 framework
which checks this.

So luckily this only concerns this driver.

Regards,

	Hans


   537          vb2_v4l2 = container_of(vb, struct vb2_v4l2_buffer, vb2_buf);
   538          mtkbuf = container_of(vb2_v4l2, struct mtk_video_dec_buf, vb);
   539
   540          if ((buf->type == V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE) &&
   541              (buf->m.planes[0].bytesused == 0)) {
   542                  mtkbuf->lastframe = true;
   543                  mtk_v4l2_debug(1, "[%d] (%d) id=%d lastframe=%d (%d,%d, %d) vb=%p",
   544                           ctx->id, buf->type, buf->index,
   545                           mtkbuf->lastframe, buf->bytesused,
   546                           buf->m.planes[0].bytesused, buf->length,
   547                           vb);
   548          }
   549
   550          return v4l2_m2m_qbuf(file, ctx->m2m_ctx, buf);
   551  }

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux