Am Sonntag, den 04.10.2009, 00:52 +0200 schrieb Hermann Pitton: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 21:09 +0200 schrieb Paweł Sikora: > > On Saturday 03 October 2009 20:15:27 Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > > moreover, with this patch i'm observing a flood in dmesg: > > > > > > > > [ 938.313245] i2c IR (Pinnacle PCTV): unknown key: key=0x12 raw=0x12 > > > > down=1 [ 938.419914] i2c IR (Pinnacle PCTV): unknown key: key=0x12 > > > > raw=0x12 down=0 [ 939.273249] i2c IR (Pinnacle PCTV): unknown key: > > > > key=0x24 raw=0x24 down=1 [ 939.379955] i2c IR (Pinnacle PCTV): unknown > > > > key: key=0x24 raw=0x24 down=0 > > > > > > Different issue, and I don't know much about IR support, but these keys > > > aren't listed in ir_codes_pinnacle_color. Maybe you have a different > > > variant of this remote control with more keys and we need to add their > > > definitions. > > > > i have such one: http://imgbin.org/index.php?page=image&id=812 > > hm, maybe it is some fake Pinnacle stuff, at least that remote is very > different from the supported ones with gray only or colored keys and > looks very poor. > > I would have to boot into vista to check if it could be one of the new > missing remotes. That the original Pinnacle logo with the P with the red > ball and the yellow light point is not on it looks at least suspicious. Might be type 5 then in different color and the point above the Pinnacle i is not red ... > > > Which keys are triggering these messages? > > > > this is the funny thing because i'm not pressing any keys at all. > > the remote control is unused currently becasue i'm using only > > pinnacle svideo input for watching sat-tv with tvtime. > > Else, anyway, we have a disabled Pinnacle remote already on the 300i > conflicting with other stuff, we have also devices with the same PCI > subsystem as 310i with and without LNA and now some new remote. > > The old undocumented LNA support was broken in favor to have new > undocumented LNA support for some undocumented/unidentified Hauppauge > HVR1110 devices. > > Obviously they have been mad enough also not only not to change the > subsystem, but did let even the receiver chip on the same 0x47 address. > > I had all my comments already previously. > > Hauppauge bought Pinnacle some time back for such products, but we are > far away from to get eeprom and checksum information to sort that mess. > > Since I have been told, nobody has access to such information yet, folks > must make their decisions. Seems recent saa7134 Pinnacle stuff is not > the first choice. > > Cheers, > Hermann
Attachment:
another-310i-remote.jpg
Description: JPEG image
