Am Freitag, den 14.10.2016, 18:06 +0100 schrieb Ian Arkver: > On 14/10/16 16:48, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 08.10.2016, 01:43 +0300 schrieb Sakari Ailus: > > [...] > > [...] > >>> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-async.h b/include/media/v4l2-async.h > >>> index 8e2a236..e4e4b11 100644 > >>> --- a/include/media/v4l2-async.h > >>> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-async.h > >>> @@ -114,6 +114,18 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev, > >>> struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier); > >>> > >>> /** > >>> + * __v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev - adds a subdevice to the notifier waitlist > >>> + * > >>> + * @v4l2_notifier: notifier the calling subdev is bound to > >> s/v4l2_// > > I'd be happy to, but why should the v4l2 prefix be removed? > > > > regards > > Philipp > I think Sakari is just pointing out that the comment doesn't match the > function argument name. Ouch, that's very obvious now that I understand :) Thank you for pointing this out. regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
