Hi Javier,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:14:01PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Sakari,
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback.
>
> On 08/11/2016 07:18 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:10:43PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >>>
> >>> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, registered_async);
> >>> + if (ret < 0) {
> >>> + if (notifier->unbind)
> >>> + notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, asd);
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> if (list_empty(¬ifier->waiting) && notifier->complete)
> >>> return notifier->complete(notifier);
> >>
> >> I noticed this just now but what do you need this and the next patch for?
> >>
> >> We already have a callback for the same purpose: it's
> >> v4l2_subdev_ops.internal_ops.registered(). And there's similar
> >> unregistered() callback as well.
> >>
>
> Oh, I missed we already had those calls. When adding the connector
> support, I looked at struct v4l2_subdev_core_ops and didn't find a
> callback that fit but didn't notice we already had a .registered()
> in struct struct v4l2_subdev_internal_ops. Sorry about that...
No worries. I hadn't time to review the patches either.
> >> Could you use these callbacks instead?
>
> Yes, those can be used indeed. I'll post patches using that instead
> and removing the .registered_async callback since as you said isn't
> really needed.
I'd appreciate that! Please cc me when you do so.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
