On 15/07/16 16:20, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:30:51 +0100 > Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> The result of mb86a20s_readreg(state, 0x0a) & 0xf is always in the range >> 0x00 to 0x0f and can never be negative, so remove the redundant check >> of the result being less than zero. >> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/media/dvb-frontends/mb86a20s.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/mb86a20s.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/mb86a20s.c >> index fb88ddd..0205846 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/mb86a20s.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/mb86a20s.c >> @@ -302,8 +302,6 @@ static int mb86a20s_read_status(struct dvb_frontend *fe, enum fe_status *status) >> *status = 0; >> >> val = mb86a20s_readreg(state, 0x0a) & 0xf; >> - if (val < 0) >> - return val; > > Actually, mb86a20s_readreg() can return a negative value. Oops, yep, clearly my code is stupid. I'll send a fix soon. > > Please change the above logic to first check for the value returned > from mb86a20s_readreg() and then apply the bitmask. > > Thanks, > Mauro > >> >> if (val >= 2) >> *status |= FE_HAS_SIGNAL; > > > > Thanks, > Mauro > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
