On 04/02/2016 04:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hi Hans and Guennadi, > > This is the second opus of this RFC. The goal is still to see how close our > ports are to see if there are things we could either reuse of change. > > From RFCv1, the main change is cleaning up in function names and functions > grouping, and fixes to make v4l2-compliance happy while live tests still show no > regression. > > For the next steps, I'll have to : > - split the second patch, which will be a headache task, into : > - first functions grouping and renaming > => this to ensure the "internal functions" are almost untouched It helps to review, but don't spend too much time on this either. By and large it didn't look too bad when I reviewed the code. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
