On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:19:28PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote: > The workqueue "work_thread" is involved in updating parameters for > transfers. It has a single work item(&sd->work) and hence > doesn't require ordering. Also, it is not being used on a memory > reclaim path. Hence, the singlethreaded workqueue has been replaced with > the use of system_wq. > > System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency > for a long time now and hence it's not required to have a singlethreaded > workqueue just to gain concurrency. Unlike a dedicated per-cpu workqueue > created with create_singlethread_workqueue(), system_wq allows multiple > work items to overlap executions even on the same CPU; however, a > per-cpu workqueue doesn't have any CPU locality or global ordering > guarantee unless the target CPU is explicitly specified and thus the > increase of local concurrency shouldn't make any difference. > > Work item has been flushed in sd_stop0() to ensure that there are no > pending tasks while disconnecting the driver. > > Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/usb/gspca/zc3xx.c | 13 ++++--------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/gspca/zc3xx.c b/drivers/media/usb/gspca/zc3xx.c > index c5d8ee6..ebdfed4d6 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/usb/gspca/zc3xx.c > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/gspca/zc3xx.c > @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ struct sd { > struct v4l2_ctrl *jpegqual; > > struct work_struct work; > - struct workqueue_struct *work_thread; > > u8 reg08; /* webcam compression quality */ > > @@ -6826,8 +6825,7 @@ static int sd_start(struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev) > return gspca_dev->usb_err; > > /* Start the transfer parameters update thread */ > - sd->work_thread = create_singlethread_workqueue(KBUILD_MODNAME); > - queue_work(sd->work_thread, &sd->work); > + schedule_work(&sd->work); > > return 0; > } > @@ -6838,12 +6836,9 @@ static void sd_stop0(struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev) > { > struct sd *sd = (struct sd *) gspca_dev; > > - if (sd->work_thread != NULL) { > - mutex_unlock(&gspca_dev->usb_lock); > - destroy_workqueue(sd->work_thread); > - mutex_lock(&gspca_dev->usb_lock); > - sd->work_thread = NULL; > - } > + mutex_unlock(&gspca_dev->usb_lock); > + schedule_work(&sd->work); > + mutex_lock(&gspca_dev->usb_lock); Shouldn't this be flush? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html