On Wed, 11 May 2016 12:22:44 -0400 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Alban, > > On 05/11/2016 11:40 AM, Alban Bedel wrote: > > In v4l2_async_test_notify() if the registered_async callback or the > > complete notifier returns an error the subdev is not unregistered. > > This leave paths where v4l2_async_register_subdev() can fail but > > leave the subdev still registered. > > > > Add the required calls to v4l2_device_unregister_subdev() to plug > > these holes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c > > index ceb28d4..43393f8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c > > @@ -121,13 +121,19 @@ static int v4l2_async_test_notify(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier, > > > > ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, registered_async); > > if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD) { > > + v4l2_device_unregister_subdev(sd); > > if (notifier->unbind) > > notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, asd); > > return ret; > > } > > > > - if (list_empty(¬ifier->waiting) && notifier->complete) > > - return notifier->complete(notifier); > > + if (list_empty(¬ifier->waiting) && notifier->complete) { > > + ret = notifier->complete(notifier); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > + v4l2_device_unregister_subdev(sd); > > Isn't a call to notifier->unbind() missing here as well? > > Also, I think the error path is becoming too duplicated and complex, so > maybe we can have a single error path and use goto labels as is common > in Linux? For example something like the following (not tested) can be > squashed on top of your change: Yes, that look better. I'll test it and report tomorrow. Alban
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature