> A question on best practices here... I already did a v8 (but only as > a branch) so I think this will be v9, bit that's a minor detail. The > real question is what I should do about patches 1-15 that are already > in next? Send them too? If not, should I send 16-24 with the same old > patch numbers or should they be numbered 1-9 now? And should such a > shortened series be rebased on 1-15 in next? > > Or does it not really matter? Easiest for me is: Send as v9, only the patches not yet applied, numbered from 1-9, based on my for-next.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature