On 04/May/2016 16:34, Andrey Utkin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:17:08AM -0300, Ismael Luceno wrote: > > Such frame size is met in practice. Also report oversized frames. > > > > Based on patches by Andrey Utkin <andrey.utkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > If it is based on my patches([1] [2]), then why you claim authorship and > why you don't let me know (at last CCing me)? Wasn't my intention, I gave you credit, I just merged the changes and reworked the warning and commit message. The whole point to have solo6x10 mainlined was to get rid of the out-of-tree driver and convert the DKMS package to use media_build, thus mainline should be kept in sync, so why are you not submitting the patches yourself? I should have nothing to do with that. > Do you know that 200 KiB is not the limit, just as previous value? I > haven't researched subj deep enough to figure out proven good value for > new buffer size. I know, I know it depends on the quantization matrix, and it should be possible to infer the limit, but like you I didn't do the research, the difference is that I don't get paid to do it anymore. > It's both laughable and infuriating for me to spectate your behaviour of > "stealth driver developer". > You have added yourself back to driver maintainers in MAINTAINERS file > after your quit without letting us know. Why the attack? I didn't quit, I was dismissed, and the remaining ~5k USD I'm owed was never paid. Curtis: any comment on that? Also, I don't see what's the problem in re-adding myself, and I don't understand why I was removed in the first place, it's not up to Bluecherry, is it? > You are not affiliated with Bluecherry for two years, and you are not > informed about how the driver is working in production on customers > setups. So you are not aware what are real issues with it. BTW do you > still have a sample of actual hardware? Yeah, I agree that this can be > argument against Bluecherry and lack of openness in its bug tracking. You attend Bluecherry customers' needs because you're part of Bluecherry; like you said I'm not, and I certainly don't get paid to care about the out-of-tree driver issues or it's bug tracker. And yes, I still have the hardware. > But you are also not open and not collaborating. What do you think I should do? Seriously, I don't get it. > The point of my accusation to you is that you seem to be just gaining > "kernel developer" score for nobody's (except your CV's) benefit. > Development and maintenance is what Hans Verkuil, Krzysztof Halasa and > others do to this driver, but not this. > > Sorry to be harsh. I think you're the only one keeping such a score, and I never claimed my work being more or superior to anyone's else. You're out of your mind, man. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
