Re: Media controller: sysfs vs ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hans Verkuil schrieb:
Hi all,

I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the discussions of the
media controller as a concept.

First of all, I have no doubt that everything that you can do with an ioctl,
you can also do with sysfs and vice versa. That's not the problem here.

The problem is deciding which approach is the best.


Is it really a good idea to create a dependency to some virtual file system which may go away in future?
From time to time some of those seem to go away, for example devfs.

Is it really unavoidable to have something in sysfs, something which is really not possible with ioctls?
And do you really want to depend on sysfs developers?

--Winfried


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux