Em Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:43:02 +0200 Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Sunday 13 September 2009 15:27:57 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:13:04 +0900 > > Nathaniel Kim <dongsoo.kim@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > > > > > 2009. 9. 12., 오전 7:21, Hans Verkuil 작성: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the > > > > discussions of the > > > > media controller as a concept. > > > > > > > > First of all, I have no doubt that everything that you can do with > > > > an ioctl, > > > > you can also do with sysfs and vice versa. That's not the problem > > > > here. > > > > > > > > The problem is deciding which approach is the best. > > > > > > > > What is sysfs? (taken from http://lwn.net/Articles/31185/) > > > > > > > > "Sysfs is a virtual filesystem which provides a userspace-visible > > > > representation > > > > of the device model. The device model and sysfs are sometimes > > > > confused with each > > > > other, but they are distinct entities. The device model functions > > > > just fine > > > > without sysfs (but the reverse is not true)." > > > > > > > > Currently both a v4l driver and the device nodes are all represented > > > > in sysfs. > > > > This is handled automatically by the kernel. > > > > > > > > Sub-devices are not represented in sysfs since they are not based on > > > > struct > > > > device. They are v4l-internal structures. Actually, if the subdev > > > > represents > > > > an i2c device, then that i2c device will be present in sysfs, but > > > > not all > > > > subdevs are i2c devices. > > > > > > > > Should we make all sub-devices based on struct device? Currently > > > > this is not > > > > required. Doing this would probably mean registering a virtual bus, > > > > then > > > > attaching the sub-device to that. Of course, this only applies to > > > > sub-devices > > > > that represent something that is not an i2c device (e.g. something > > > > internal > > > > to the media board like a resizer, or something connected to GPIO > > > > pins). > > > > > > > > If we decide to go with sysfs, then we have to do this. This part > > > > shouldn't > > > > be too difficult to implement. And also if we do not go with sysfs > > > > this might > > > > be interesting to do eventually. > > > > > > > > The media controller topology as I see it should contain the device > > > > nodes > > > > since the application has to know what device node to open to do the > > > > streaming. > > > > It should also contain the sub-devices so the application can > > > > control them. > > > > Is this enough? I think that eventually we also want to show the > > > > physical > > > > connectors. I left them out (mostly) from the initial media > > > > controller proposal, > > > > but I suspect that we want those as well eventually. But connectors > > > > are > > > > definitely not devices. In that respect the entity concept of the > > > > media > > > > controller is more abstract than sysfs. > > > > > > > > However, for now I think we can safely assume that sub-devices can > > > > be made > > > > visible in sysfs. > > > > > > > > > > Hans, > > > > > > First of all I'm very sorry that I had not enough time to go through > > > your new RFC. I'll checkout right after posting this mail. > > > > > > I think this is a good approach and I also had in my mind that sysfs > > > might be a good method if we could control and monitor through this. > > > Recalling memory when we had a talk in San Francisco, I was frustrated > > > that there is no way to catch events from sort of sub-devices like > > > lens actuator (I mean pizeo motors in camera module). As you know lens > > > actuator is an extremely slow device in comparison with common v4l2 > > > devices we are using and we need to know whether it has succeeded or > > > not in moving to expected position. > > > So I considered sysfs and udev as candidates for catching events from > > > sub-devices. events like success/failure of lens movement, change of > > > status of subdevices. > > > Does anybody experiencing same issue? I think I've seen a lens > > > controller driver in omap3 kernel from TI but not sure how did they > > > control that. > > > > > > My point is that we need a kind of framework to give and event to user > > > space and catching them properly just like udev does. > > > > Maybe the Kernel event interface could be used for that. > > Are you talking about the input event interface? There is no standard kernel > way of doing events afaik. Yes. It is designed for low-latency report of events, like mouse movements, where you expect that the movement will happen as mouse moves. So, it may work fine also for servo movements. A closer look on it, plus some tests should be done to see if it will work fine for such camera events. Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
