>> >> Up to now I usually saw the master-slave relationship defined as per >> whether the protocol is "master" or "slave," which always was used from >> the PoV of the bridge. I.e., even in a camera datasheet a phrase like >> "supports master-parallel mode" means supports a mode in which the bridge >> is a master and the camera is a slave. So, maybe it is better instead of >a >> .is_master flag to use a .master_mode flag? > >Sounds reasonable. I'll check a few datasheets myself to see what >terminology >they use. Master/Slave is always confusing to me. In VPFE, it can act as master (when it output sync signal and pixel clock) and slave (when it get sync signal from sensor/decoder). We use VPFE as slave and sensor/decoder will provide the pixel clock and sync signal. Please confirm if this is what master_mode flag means. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
